查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論東晉墓誌兼及蘭亭論辨= |
---|---|
作者 | 華人德; |
期刊 | 故宮學術季刊 |
出版日期 | 19950900 |
卷期 | 13:1 民84.秋 |
頁次 | 頁27-62+左2 |
分類號 | 942 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 東晉; 蘭亭序; 王羲之; 南北朝; 隸書; Eastern Tsin; Preface to Lan-t'ing Pavilion; Wang-Hsi-chih; Southern and Northern Dynasties; Li-shu; |
中文摘要 | 東晉墓誌大多為僑遷到江左的北方士族而設,僅記諱字、爵里、卒葬時間、姻親 、墓之方位,有些有「刻石(磚)為識」語,不繫銘辭,亦無行誼,還有文辭更簡約的。質 地以磚為多,字跡粗率,只是作為以後遷葬祖塋時辨認棺木的記識,故一任工匠書刻。西晉 、南北朝的墓誌由於設置的意圖不同,在形制、文辭和書刻諸方面均要比東晉墓誌講究。而 東晉北方僑遷來的士族階層卻產生了卓越的書法�橝憿A其中最傑出的代表是二王,他們的成 就之一是變古法,其新體當時還不可能為民間所仿效。蘭亭論辨是從王、謝墓誌的出土而引 發的,認為《蘭亭序》是偽跡的一派,再三將東晉墓誌刻字作為例證,來推定「王羲之書法 必須有隸書筆意而後可」,《蘭亭序》的書體不可能出現在王羲之的時代。這種將工匠的書 刻字跡來作為比較、推測王羲之新體的重要參照物,是不科學的。 |
英文摘要 | Many epitaph inscriptions from the Eastern Tsin were composed for the northern nobility preparing to move to chiang-nan. The epitaphs are brief, orecording only the surnane, titles, time of death and burial, details of the family of the deceased, as well as the direction which the tomb faced. Some inscriptions on rocks or bricks, even included a line reading "the stone (brick) inscription serves as a marker" with no further details of the deceased. Others are even simpler. Most epitaphs were executed on brick in characteristically crude script, hastily finished by craftsmen as marks of identification for those returning to visit the ancestral graves in the north. Epitaphs of the Western Tsin and Southern and Northern Dynasties, however, are considerably more refined in terms of form, con-tent, and style. Many exceptional calligraphers hailed from the literati community of the Eastern Tsin in the north, two of the more representative figures being Wang Hsi-chih and Wang Hsien-chih. The two calligraphers created an innovative style based on ancient calligraphy, one that would not have been popularized during their time. With the discovery of epitaph inscriptions of the Wang and Hsieh families, many scholars have argued that the Preface to Lan-t'ing Pavilion (Lan-t'ing hsu) can not be attributed to Wang Hsi-chih. These scholars repeatedly cite Eastern Tsin inscriptions as evidence that the clerical style of calligraphy (li-shu) must be a determining characteristic of Wang Hsi-chih's work, hence the Preface to Lan-t'ing Pavilion could not date to Wang Hsi-chih's time. This line of reasoning is faulty as the works of craftsmen can not serve as standard to evaluate the innovative calligraphy of Wang Hsi-chih. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。