查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 盧一尼神經心理測驗組之中文修訂與常模建立研究
- 「大學生注意力缺失/過動疾患反應評估量表學生自陳量表繁體中文版」(C-CARE-SRI)編修及心理計量特質分析研究
- Taiwanese Traditional-Chinese Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory: Revision, Investigation of Psychometric Properties, and Establishing of Norms
- 我國中小學及大專學生體適能常模之建立
- 盧一尼神經心理測驗組中文修訂版的信效度研究
- 切換式電源供應器之雜訊消減技術
- 休閒文化觀光行為的規範--以原住民觀光為例
- 利用試題反應理論編製國中壘球擲準測驗
- 國內男青年走與跑之足底壓力分析
- 共通模與正常模雜訊對策之關鍵性科技
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 盧一尼神經心理測驗組之中文修訂與常模建立研究=The Chinese Revision and the Norm Development of Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery |
---|---|
作 者 | 郭乃文; 余麗樺; 潘秀琴; 吳玉欣; 林亭宇; | 書刊名 | 復健醫學會雜誌 |
卷 期 | 27:2 1999.06[民88.06] |
頁 次 | 頁47-55 |
分類號 | 415.9 |
關鍵詞 | 盧一尼神經心理測驗組; 中文版; 常模; 臨界水準; 鑑別效度; LNNB; Chinese revision; Norm; Critical level; Differential validity; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究乃參照原測驗編製者的想法與批評者的論點,將盧-尼神經心理測驗組修 訂為中文適用的版本(LNNB-C)。研究目標:其一,各題項的翻譯、修訂,以及編製。其二, 以實證資料,進行各題項的項目分析。其三,建立地區常模與臨界水準,並討論人口變項因 素對各臨床量尺分數的影響。其四:討論臨界水準的鑑別效度。研究成果:修訂版仍為十一 個臨床量尺,共270個題項。經難度分析與鑑別力分析後,LNNB-C共計更改110個題項的 切點;這樣的修訂幅度與希臘版(LNNB-G)相近。之後,以全部控制組在各臨床量尺之總分, 來建立T分數常模與臨界水準。此預估公式,與LNNB題本-I、題本-II,以及LNNB-G的 公式都十分接近。此外,發現教育年數、年齡,以及性別三背景變項對各臨床量尺的影響力 不盡相同,教育年數在十一個臨床量尺中都達顯著;而年齡只在六個量尺,性別只在三個量 尺上達顯著。結論:此修訂研究使LNNB-C具有臨床價值。建議各分量尺應可使用個別的 臨界水準的計算公式來預估受試者的功能。最後,在分量尺層次的鑑別效度上,本研究發現 無論採個別量尺或平均量尺的臨界水準為判準,都不影響區辨腦傷組的命中率,只影響正常 組的命中率。(中華復健醫誌1999; 27(2):47-55) |
英文摘要 | The Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery(LNNB) is a comprehensive assessment system based on Luria's theory of functional systems of the brain. It remains as the most popular neuropsychological battery across different cultures in past 20 years. This study was to develop a standardized Chinese version of the LNNB on the basis of Luria's theory and the critics' viewpoints. The study have four objectives: (1) to translate and adapt the original test battery into the Chinese language. (2) to conduct item analysis and convert raw scores to scale scores, (3) to establish local norm and total critical level prediction formula, and to derive individual critical level prediction formula for each clinical scale, (4) to compare the differential validity of two kinds of formulas. The new version was evaluated for its representativeness, appropriateness, as well as clarity of test items. The final Chinese version still had 11 clinical scales which consisted of 270 items, called 'LNNB-C'. LNNB-C was then administered to 75 normal controls and 47 brain-damaged patients. Based on test results, new cutoff points of impaired scores for scoring LNNB-C items were established. Overall, new cutoff points for 110 items were established. The number of revised items was similar to the Greek version of the LNNB. Normative data were developed for all 11 clinical scales based on the scores of LNNB-C with 130 normal controls. The critical level prediction formula was derived by a linear multiple regression analysis, with age and education as the independent variables and the mean of T-scores of all clinical scales as the dependent variable. This total-formula of LNNB-C was found to be similar to American and Greek's. In addition, age, education, and sex were found to have differential effects on performance of different clinical scales. Individual-f ormulas were thus derived separately for different critical scales of LNNB-C. At last, using individual-formula to differentiate patients from controls didn't raise the sensitivity, but it did raise the specificity a little. (J Rehab Med Assoc ROC 1999; 27(2):47-55) |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。