查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 民主進步黨的修憲策略分析--以第二階段憲政改革為例證 |
---|---|
作者 | 何輝慶; | 書刊名 | 中山學術論叢 |
卷期 | 13 1995.06[民84.06] |
頁次 | 頁299-319 |
分類號 | 581.25 |
關鍵詞 | 憲政改革; 群眾路線; 議會路線; 臺灣獨立; 臺灣憲法草案; Constitutional reform; Mass line; Parliamentary line; Taiwan independence; The draft for a new Taiwan constitution; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 「本文將民進黨在第二階段修憲會議中,策略運用的事實作縱斷面和橫切面的分 析: (1)首先就民進黨過去在改革運動中,其策略理念由爭議(例如群眾路線與議會路線,政治民主化與臺灣獨立等)到匯整的歷史作一回顧。 (2)次就這些理念實踐的策略轉換(如內閣制與總統制)與落實(如民主大憲章草案和臺灣憲法草案)作一說明。 (3)最後則就臺灣憲法草案如何在第二次修憲會議中策略運用,分別在一般提案中提出39件(共有167件),和修憲提案中提出38件(共有129件)的過程及內涵,加以比對分析。 (4)結語中則針對民進黨策略的運用,提出一些反思:如何更加成熟的、理性的運用策略,以維護臺灣全體居民的權益,尤其是對運用臺獨主張這個嚴肅的課題,更須注意到事實判斷、價值判斷和後果判斷,以求取一個最佳的策略選擇。 |
英文摘要 | The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is currently the most influential opposition party. After the lifting of martial law, the degree of democratization in Taiwan has become higher and higher which has allowed the DPP much political freedom. The main purpose of the DPP is to declare the establishment of an independent state on Taiwan through a plebiscite. Over the years, the DPP advocacy for Taiwan Independence changed from conducting propaganda (by taking to the streets) to that of gaining recognition (by using parliamentary systems). The Constitutional Amendment Conference for the Second Phase Constitutional Reform Meeting of the National Assembly held from 20 March to 30 May 1992, with the DPP's boycott from 4 May onwards, was an important political event for the DPP because the DPP changed their idea of completely immediate Taiwan Independence into a large ranger phased type of independence. This article attempts to analyze the strategy deployed by the DPP at the Constitutional Amendment Conference for the Second Phase Constitutional Reform Meeting from all angles (vertical and cross sections). The first part is a historic excursion into DPP's evolutionary strategy from dispute (such as mass line or parliamentary line, democratization of politics or Taiwan Independence) to integration. The second part includes two sections: the strategy change from a Cabinet system to a presidential system﹣the implementation of the Draft for a Greater Democracy and a draft for a new Taiwan Constitution. The third part analyzes and compares the process and content of this strategy for drafting a new Taiwan Constitution which was accomplished at the Constitutional Amendment Conference from which 39 general motions of the total 167 made and 38 constitutional motions of the total 129 were made by the DPP. In conclusion are the thoughts and suggestions by the author on how to make use of strategy in a mature and reasonable manner so as to safeguard the rights of the residents of Taiwan especially when it comes to the serious topic of Taiwan Independence. The author concludes that special emphasis must be placed on fact and value as well as on the results for an optimum strategy. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。