查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 西方馬克思主義在中國的論爭--兼談臺灣學界對大陸馬列哲學爭辯之介入 |
---|---|
作 者 | 洪鎌德; | 書刊名 | 中山學術論叢 |
卷 期 | 13 1995.06[民84.06] |
頁 次 | 頁1-20 |
分類號 | 549.4 |
關鍵詞 | 西方馬克思主義; 西馬; 西馬論爭; 論戰; 兩岸學術交流; Western Marxism; The Debate on Western Marxism; Academic exchange between both sides of the Taiwan Strait; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文首先指出1986年以來中國思想界以社科院徐崇溫為代表,以及以編譯局杜章智為中心的兩派學者,對西方馬克思主義(西馬)的評介所引發的爭論。 其次�d述本文作者對論戰雙方所作之分析與評論, 認為此番西馬爭辯是圍繞著(1)西馬概念的引進;(2)西馬的性質和特徵;(3)代表性人物的列舉;和(4)西馬可否視為當代馬克思主義﹖四個主題來展開。 其後提及此一爭論在天安門事件後一度沈寂,但在1990年雙方的論戰越過臺灣海峽而延伸到臺北刊印的《中國論壇》之上。參與辯論的除了中國的學者徐、杜之外,又加上王吉勝,而臺灣方面捲入這個紛爭的有洪鎌德與陳墇津。論戰並沒有分別勝負,問題也沒有釐清,不過此一爭辯對中國學術的現代化與國際化產生相當的作用,對兩岸的學術與思想的交流也產生一定的影響。 |
英文摘要 | The article deals with the theoretical debate between Xu Congwen, a philosopher of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and a group of scholars led by Du Zhang-zhi, a translator of the Translation Bureau of the CCP, on the concept, content and reception of Western Marxism (WM) in China. According to the author, the dispute revolves around the following fundamental issues: (1) the concept of WM; (2) the basic features of WM; (3) the leading figures of WM; and (4) the nature of WM (whether it is one of contemporary schools of Marxism). After the Tiananmen Incident the debate seemed to peter out. Yet the controversy regained its momentum when Du Zhang-zhi's associate published a polemic article in Taipei in 1990. Two Taiwanese scholars, Hung Lien-te and Chen Chang-chin were engrossed in the debate. The treatise elaborates on their arguments. Finally, the essay brings out the meaning of this contention for the modernization attempts and openning-up policy of China and its relevance for the further academic exchange between both sides of the Taiwan Strait. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。