查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 不同代表隊基本體能之比較及動力相關之研究 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 蘇耿賦; | 書刊名 | 嘉義農專學報 |
卷期 | 40 1995.02[民84.02] |
頁次 | 頁193-215 |
分類號 | 993.16 |
關鍵詞 | 代表隊; 基本體能; 比較; 動力; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要目的在探討(一)不同項目代表隊基本體能之比較分析(二)不 同代表隊動力之比較 (三)基本體能與動力間之相關分析。以國立嘉義農專男子 田徑隊(15人)、游泳隊(10人)、羽球隊(15人)、足球隊(15人)做各項基本體能之比 較,並與動力做相互間關係之探討。將所得資料統計、分析與討論,獲得以下結 論:(一)各項基本體能之比較: 1. 握力:握力成績田徑隊明顯優於游泳隊及足球隊。 2. 背肌力:背肌力經變異數分析雖達(p<.05)顯著差異,但經薛費氏考驗,在各隊 中並無顯著差異。 3. 引體向上:各隊在引體向上並無顯著差異(p>.05) 4. 體前彎:各隊在體前彎並無顯著差異(p>.05) 5. 體後彎:體後彎成續游泳隊及羽球隊明顯優於足球隊。 6. 折返跑:折返跑成績田徑隊明顯優於足球隊。 7. 垂直跳:垂直跳成績田徑隊及羽球隊明顯優於足球隊,羽球隊亦高於游泳隊。 8. 立定跳:立定跳成績僅游泳隊與足球隊未達顯著差異(p>.05)。 9. 五十公尺:五十公尺成績田徑隊、羽球隊及足球隊明顯優於游泳隊。 (二)不同代表隊動力之比較: 田徑隊動力之成績為121.04±5.40kg-m/sec。 游泳隊動力之成績為85.81±2.91kg-m/sec。 羽球隊動力之成績為109.59±5.39kg-m/sec。 足球隊動力之成績為83.90±2.95kg-m/sec。 各隊動力成續僅游泳隊與足球隊未達顯著差異(p>.05)。 (三)基本體能與動力間之關係: 1. 馬加利亞--卡門動力測驗與背肌力達顯著相關(p<.01)。 2. 馬加利亞--卡門動力測驗與握力、折返跑、垂直跳、立定跳、五十公尺等項 目達顯著相關(p<.001)。 3. 馬加利亞--卡門動力測驗與引體向上、站立體前彎、俯臥仰體後彎等項目未 達顯著相關(p>.01)。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this research is to study - (1) the comparative analyses ofbasic energy of representative teams for different athletic items (2) the dynamic comparison for different representative teams (3) the relative analysesbetween basic energy and dynamics. Comparing the basic energy and studyingthe relative dynamics from the samples of the athletic teams (15 persons), swimming team (10 persons), badminton team (15 persons), and football team (15persons) of National Chia-Yi Institute of Agriculture, I find the followingconclusions: 一、 Comparison of various of various basic energy 1. Grip Strength: The athletic team obviously is superior to the swimming team and football team. 2. Back Strength: There is no obvious difference among the mentioned teams according to shelf e'smothod Test, although there is a difference (p<.05) by One Way Anova. 3. Chin-Up: No obvious difference among the teams (p<.05) 4. Forward Trunk Extension: No obvious difference among the teams (p<-05). 5. Prone Arrow-like Position: The swimming team and badminton team are obviously superior to football team. 6. huttle Run: The athletic team is obviously superior to football team. 7. Vertical Jump: The athletic team and badminton team are obviously su perior to football team. The badminton team is superior to the swimming team. 8. Stand Jump: Only the swimming team and football team do not have an obvious difference. 9. 50-meter Sprint: The athletic team, badminton team and football team are obviously superior to the swimming team. 二、 Comparison of dynamics among different teams Dynamics for athletic team is 121.04+5.40kg-m/sec. Dynamics for swimming team is 85.81+2.91kg-m/sec. Dynamics for badminton team is 109.59+5.39kg-m/sec. Dynamics for football team is 83.90+2.95kg-m/sec. Only the swimming team and football team do not have an obvious differ ence. 三、 The relationship between basic energy and dynamics 1. There is an obvious difference Margaria-Kalamen power test and back strength. 2. There is an obvious difference among Margaria-Kalamen power test,grip strength, shuttle run, vertical jump, stand jump, and 50-meter sprint. 3. There is no obvious difference among chin-up, forward trunk extension, prone arrow-like position, and Margaria-Kalamen power test. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。