頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 幽默廣告在不同情境下對不同涉入程度產品的說服效果 |
---|---|
作 者 | 唐士祥; 陳皎眉; | 書刊名 | 教育與心理研究 |
卷 期 | 17 1994.09[民83.09] |
頁 次 | 頁425-454 |
分類號 | 497.01317 |
關鍵詞 | 幽默廣告; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 幽默廣告的效果一直是廣告界爭議的議題,而涉入程度可能是導致幽默廣告有不 同效果的一個重要中介變項。 根據 Petty & Cacioppo ( 1986 )所提的思考可能性模式 ( elaboration likelihood model;簡稱 ELM )來看,高低涉入的不同,的確可以使不同 變項對態度改變的影響有不同的效果。 Celsi & Olson ( 1988 )認為在研究涉入時應考 慮「與個人相關的情境來源」(情境涉入)以及「與個人相關的內在來源」(持久涉入)。 而以往探討幽默廣告說服效果的研究,只針對產品等持久涉入的因素來探討,而忽略了情境 涉入的因素。 所以本研究欲從 ELM 的角度來探討幽默廣告的說服效果,研究幽默訴求是否 在不同的情境對不同的產品會有不同的說服效果。 本研究採三因子的實驗設計。操弄的獨變項為:產品(高 vs. 低持久涉入:電腦 vs. 飲料 )、廣告的訴求方式(一般廣告 vs. 或幽默廣告)、與情境涉入(高 vs. 低情境涉入:有 vs. 無促銷活動)探討其對認知評估、所形成的廣告態度、所形成的產品態度以及購買意願 等依變項的影響。 研究結果顯示:對於不同的產品,要用不同的廣告訴求方式,才能達到說服效果。以電腦這 種高涉入的產品而言,適用一般廣告;而以奶茶此種低涉入的產品,則是幽默廣告的說服效 果較好。而本研究因為情境涉入的操弄不是非常成功,因此情境涉入對廣告說服效果的影響 還需進一步研究才能確定。 |
英文摘要 | The effect of humorous advertisement is still an issue of controversy and level of involvement may be the most important mediating variable. According to "the elaboration likelihood model (ELM)" (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986), many variables influening attitude differ between high and low involvement subjects. Celsi & Olson (1988) suggested that research should consider both "situational sources of personal relevance (SSPR)" and "intrinsic sources of personal relevance (ISPR)" when studying the issue of involvement. Previous research tended to focus mostly on the latter but ignored the former. Therefore, the present study investigate the different persuasive effects of humorous advertisement in different situations. The experiment adopted a 2x2x2 three factorial design. The independent variables were: product (high vs. low involvement products: computer vs. soft drink), advertisement appeal (ordinary vs. humorous advertisement) and situational involvement (high vs. low situation involvement: with or without promotional activity). Results indicated that for high involvement products, such as computers, ordinary, nonhumorous advertisement was more effective. But for low involvement products, such as milk tea, humourous advertisements were more persuasive. The manipulation of situational involvement in this study was not very successful, so the effect of situational involvement is still unclear and needs to be studied further. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。