查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 評楊小凱對新古典經濟學的責難
- 作為意識形態與烏托邦的新古典經濟學
- 從公共選擇途徑論全民健保保費政策之制定
- 發大哉問、究根本論、提出路解:經濟社會學的大用[評:Fred Block (1990). Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press. 227p.]
- 米塞斯的「時序偏好」V.S.新古典效用函數
- 民法第166條之1之立法政策評析
- 新古典經濟學觀點下之國家財政赤字
- 金融消費者保護法制與監理的法律經濟分析觀點--以行為經濟學的應用為中心
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 評楊小凱對新古典經濟學的責難 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 黃兆基; | 書刊名 | 香港社會科學學報 |
卷期 | 3 民83.春 |
頁次 | 頁210-225 |
分類號 | 550.1874 |
關鍵詞 | 新古典經濟學; 楊小凱; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
英文摘要 | In Yang Xiaokai's recent writings, he criticizes neoclassical economics for its inability to handle the problems of change in economic organization. More specifically, Yang argues that the dichotomy between producers and consumers and the preclusion of corner solution in neoclassical theory cause the weakness. Trying to avoid these difficulties, Yang has begun and alternative line of research he calls "new classical microeconomics". In response to Yang's criticism, this paper attempts to show that Yang sketches an unconvincing portrait of neoclassical economics. The dichotomy hypothesis is not a useful way to understand the relationship between consumers and producers in neoclassical economics. The rationales and conditions of circumvention of corner solutions given by Yang are also incorrect. Finally, some theoretical issues related to a "new classical" model are briefly discussed, and a comparison between this "new classical" model and the standard neoclassical model is drawn. The author concludes that it is difficult to see the fundamental difference between them claimed by Yang. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。