查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 相對多數vs.絕對多數:各國總統直選方式的比較研究=Plurality vs. Majority: A Comparative Study of Direct Presidential Elections |
---|---|
作 者 | 王業立; | 書刊名 | 選舉研究 |
卷 期 | 3:1 1996.05[民85.05] |
頁 次 | 頁49-67 |
分類號 | 573.5521 |
關鍵詞 | 相對多數; 絕對多數; 兩輪決選制; 社會選擇理論; 康氏原則; 杜佛傑法則; 向心理論; Relative plurality; Absolute majority; Runoff election; Social choice theory; Condorcet criterion; Duverger's law; Median voter theorem; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 儘管我國於民國八十五年三月二十三日首次舉行的總統直選,係舉行「相對多數決制」,但是這幾年來國內學術界對於總統選舉究竟應採「相對多數決」或「絕對多數決」的爭論卻未曾稍歇。在民國八十六年第四次修憲的前夕,為配合總統職權的調整,「總統選舉方式」應否更改的議題又再度被搬上檯面。許多人關切的是,就理論與實務而言,「相對多數決」與「絕對多數決」究竟有何不同? 而在國外總統選舉的經驗性資料上,採行不同的選舉制度的確可能改變選舉結果嗎?不同的選舉制度對於政黨政治的發展,又有可能造成何種不同的影響?本論文試圖從「社會選擇理論」的角度出發,針對這些問題進行探討。 本論文的研究目的,不在於証明哪一種選舉制度較為優良;也不在於探討總統直選與憲政體制的關係,而是希望能針對一般比較兩種制度的論點或說法,在觀念上得以做進一步的思考與釐清。其次,在本論文中也針對過去較為國內學者所忽略的兩種選舉制度對於政黨政治的發展,以及選民投票行為的影響等方面進行較深入的探討,希望對於國內各界人士在討論這個議題時,能提供不同的思考方向。 |
英文摘要 | Although Taiwan's direct presidential election was held first time in the history in 1996 under plurality system, the controversy over the adoption of plurality or runoff election has never concluded. During the debates, much attention has been drawn to the linkage between the elec-toral systems and the president's constitutional power. From another point of view, this study attempts to show that different electoral systems could also have different influences on party system as well as voting behavior. This study can be divided into three parts: first of all, it employs Social Choice Theory to examine the theoretical differences between these two electoral systems; secondly, it utilize empirical data to analyze the electoral results of these two systems, and finally, it shows these two electoral systems could lead to quite different consequences on party system and voting behavior. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。