查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Methods of Detecting Test Item Bias
- Rasch模式概率比法的差異試題功能分析
- 試題反應理論的介紹(13)--試題偏差的診斷
- 臺北市及新北市國中生低自我控制、社會支持與偏差行為關聯性之研究
- On Incomplete Data and the Bias-Corrected Jackknife Estimate
- CMM Inspection Planning from CAD Models
- 保七總隊船艇延壽維修的監工檢驗實務研究
- 應用基線向量乘積及最小二乘法以GPS水準測量成果推算垂線偏差之研究
- 差別試題功能(DIF)的檢定方法
- 雞肉檢體中沙門氏桿菌快速檢驗方法之探討
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Methods of Detecting Test Item Bias=試題偏差檢驗方法之比較研究 |
---|---|
作者 | 林惠芬; |
期刊 | 彰化師範大學學報 |
出版日期 | 19930600 |
卷期 | 4 1993.06[民82.06] |
頁次 | 頁249-267 |
分類號 | 521.32 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 偏差; 試題; 檢驗; |
中文摘要 | 本研究係透過文獻探討方式比較各種檢驗試題偏差之方法。所探討的 方法有:轉換試題難度法、試題特徵曲線法、卡方法、變異數分析法、點二系列 法、以及專家判斷法。從有關之比較研究的結果得知:(1)雖然專家判斷法受到許 多學者的質疑,但大部份的測驗出版商仍採用此種方法來檢驗試題是否有偏差;(2) 在各種以心理計量方式來探討試題偏差的方法中,以試題特徵曲線法在檢驗試題 是否有偏差最為敏感,但是此種方法須使用相當大的樣本,以及複雜的電腦分析 程式:(3)從實用觀點考量,則以卡方法以及轉換試題難度法較為適用。依據研究 之結果,本研究並提出未來探討的方向。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to investigate, through literature review,the differences between various methods of detecting test item bias. They are : the transformed item difficulty method, the item characteristic curvesmethod, the Chi- square technique, the analysis of variance, the point biserial correlation approach and the judgemental approach. Reviewing thecomparative studies about debiasing methods, several findings were found.They are: (1) although the judgemental review is criticized by many researchers, most test publishers still integrate it with statistical methods foridentifying biased items; (2) among the various psychometric item bias detecting methods, the item characteristic curves approach is the most sensitive to bias in item discrimination, but it is restricted by large sample size,cost and complicated computer analysis; (3)for practical consideration, theChi-square method and the transformed difficulty approach are recommended for most users. The future research is also recommended in thestudy. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。