查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Treatment Options for Upper Ureteral Calculi: A Comparison between Ureteroscopy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
- 使用體外震波碎石術及輸尿管鏡治療下段輸尿管結石之經驗
- Radiolucent Ureteral Stones or Ureteral Cancer?: A Case Report
- Radiolucent Ureteral Stones or Ureteral Cancer?: A Case Report
- Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones
- 體外電震波碎石術治療輸尿管下段結石的成本和治療效果的分析
- 泌尿道結石處理新概念
- 泌尿道結石的手術治療
- Antegrade Ureterorenoscopic Manipulation of Upper Ureteral Stones
- Jet Findings after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotrispy for Ureteral Stone: Report of a Case
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Treatment Options for Upper Ureteral Calculi: A Comparison between Ureteroscopy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy=上段輸尿管結石之治療選擇:輸尿管鏡和體外震波碎石術之比較 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 張世忠; 許悌; 郭漢崇; | 書刊名 | 慈濟醫學 |
卷期 | 5:1 1993.03[民82.03] |
頁次 | 頁15-21 |
分類號 | 416.274 |
關鍵詞 | 治療; 結石; 碎石術; 震波; 輸尿管; 輸尿管鏡; 體外; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 在總計210例上段輸尿管結石病患之分析中,結石體積較大的病患(大於 10X6厘米)若使用體外震波碎石術來治療,其結石清除率僅66.2,還低於結石體積 較小的患者(82.9)。雖然以往的經驗認為使用輸尿管鏡處理上段輸尿管結石並不 如理想,但本研究發現其結石清除率可達65。超過百分之九十之患者若成功地以 體外農波碎石治療/其碎裂之結石均在一個月內排出。總計仍有17例(7.7)接受傳統 截石術以治療結石。 作者們認為,結石若不太大,使用體外震波碎石極為理想,因其成功率可達90 以上。儘管輸尿管鏡碎石處置的效果並不差,尤其對體積較大者,但我認對此仍 持保留的態度,並建議將其保留運用在無法有效使用體外震波碎石來治療之病 患。(慈濟醫學 1993;5:15-21) |
英文摘要 | In a series of 210 patients with upper ureteral calculi stratified into 3 groups, each having aspecific merit and treatment option, were subjected to analyses. For larger calculi (10 mm x 6mm) treated with ESWL, the stone free rate (66.2) was apparently inferior to the group havingsmaller stones (82.9). Ureteroscopic manipulation (URS) previously thought to be inappropriate for proximal ureteral calculi were successful in 64.9 of cases undertaken this procedure.Ninety percent of cases finally rendered the stone free after ESWL has passed out the fragmentswithin 28 days. Open ureterolithotomy was performed in 17 patients (7.7) as afinal solution whowere refractory to both nonsurgical procedures. We conclude from the study that smaller proximal ureteral calculi are ideal cases for ESWLand a rate free of stone over 90 is anticipated with only one session of treatment. Larger stones,although much more difficult to achieve satisfactory disintegration solely by in situ ESWL, are besttreated primarily with ESWL after retrograde manipulation of the stones into the kidney. URSshould be reserved for a second-line consideration and applied as an alternative only after a failingESWL. (Tz'u-Chi Med J 1993; 5: 15-21) |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。