查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 威廉姆斯、麥克樂體育思想之探究=A Study of American Physical Education Thought of Williams and That of McCloy |
---|---|
作者 | 王建臺; Wang, Chien-tai; |
期刊 | 體育研究 |
出版日期 | 19970400 |
卷期 | 3 1997.04[民86.04] |
頁次 | 頁23-39 |
分類號 | 528.9 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 思想; 近代體育; 自然體育; Thoughts; Modern physical education; Naturliches turnen; |
中文摘要 | 本研究的目的,在於追溯及探討威廉姆斯( J.F.Williams, 1886-1966 )與麥克 樂( C.H.McCloy, 1886-1959 )體育思想內涵,並分析與比較二人體育思想之異同點。 本 文採比較研究與歷史研究法,將蒐集之文獻資料加以整理、分析、比較與詮釋。其研究結果 歸結如後: 威廉姆斯與麥克樂體育思想, 除歐陸自然體育思想波及外, 並受杜威「實驗主義」( Experimentalism ), 哲學影響及第一次世界大戰後, 美國本土「新體育」( New Physical Education )發展激盪。 基本上,兩人皆同意,體育符合一般教育的發展目標, 在此架構下,每人發展出自己的目標體系,強調不同的標的,作為體育的基本責任。論其體 系,體育在一般教育中所扮演的角色,二人各自發展出一套本質一致的解釋。而兩人不同的 課程設計概念,皆基於其各自偏重的目標;由於各自秉持著互異的價值體系,當他們應用其 目標於課程內容、教學方法、學習效果評估時,此兩家著名的理論亦導出不同的結果。其兩 者對自然體育因各自有所偏重,故在詮釋上是「同中有異」,略有不同,惟在本質上卻又「 異中有同」,殊途而同歸。其兩氏體育思想對當時美國,甚至中國,均有一定程度影響。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study is to trace the origins of and made an in quiry into the substanc of the physi cal education thoughts of J.F.Williams and C.H.McCloy, analyzing by means of comparison and contrast the similarities and differences between their physical education thoughts. The method of comparative study is adopted in this paper; the documentary materials gathered are sorted, analyzed, Compared, and interpreted. The results of the research are summed up in the following: Apart from being affected by the European Natural Physical Education thought, the physical education thought of Williams and of McMloy have been influenced by the Experimentalis of John Dewey and inspired by the New Physical Education that developed on the American continent proper after World War I. Basically, both of them agree that Physical education conforms with the developmental goals of general education. Under this conceptual framework, each of them developed his own target system, emphasizing different different goals as the funda mental responsibility of physical education. In terms of their systems, both of them developed a set of essen tially consistent interpretation of the role that physical education plays in general education. Moreover, their different concepts of programming were based on the goals they were inclined to emphasize. Owing to the different values systems they maintained, the famous theories of these two schools to different results when they applied the criteria of their goals to the evaluation of program content, teaching methods, and learning effects. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。