查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 大學手球運動員與非運動員在體格、體適能與人格特質之比較研究 |
---|---|
作 者 | 張宏文; | 書刊名 | 中原學報 |
卷 期 | 14 1985.12[民74.12] |
頁 次 | 頁117-132 |
分類號 | 528.9014 |
關鍵詞 | 人格特質; 大學; 手球; 非運動員; 運動員; 體格; 體適能; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究係取大學手球運動員60人,及一般大學生60人,總共120人為研究對象,施予個人體格之測量(體格項目包括身高、體重、肩寬、臂長、臀寬、掌寬),再給予卡氏十六種人格因素及體能測驗。 本研究之主要目的,在探討大學手球運動員與一般大學生(非運動員)在體格、體適能與人格特質之比較,以及大學手球運動員在體格、體適能、人格特質與技能表現之相互關係,以做為手球運動員選訓上之參考。 全部資料以中原大學電腦中心VAXll/850電腦,運用SPSS程式處理,獲致如下之結論: 1.在體格方面,大學手球運動員之身高、體重、肩寬、臀寬、掌寬均較一般大學生來得優異。 2.在體適能方面,大學手球運動員在50公尺快跑、4 X20公尺折返跑、引體向上、手球擲遠及1000公尺長跑等項目上,均較一般大學生為優。 3.在人格特質方面,大學手球運動員較一般大學生在樂群性(A)、興奮性 (F)、有恆性(G)、敢為性(H)及外向性(II)之得分上有較高的傾向,而在獨立性(Q2)及果斷性(N)之得分上則有較低的傾向。 4.技能表現優秀群之手球運動員在體適能中之50公尺快跑、4X1O公尺折返跑、立位體前屈1000公尺長跑等項目優於普通群之選手;而在手球擲遠、30 秒仰臥起坐及4X20公尺折返跑等項目遠遜於普通群之選手。 5.技能表現優秀群之手球運動員在體格中之臂長優於普通群之選手,而在體重、臀寬及掌寬等因素則遜於普通群選手。 6.技能表現優秀群之手球運動員在人格特質之聰慧性上之得分,較普通選手有較低的傾向。 7.全部對象以體型分類與體格、體適能及人格特質之關係,發現在體重、臀寬及立定跳遠上有顯著的差異,而這種差異則由肥胖型者所產生。 8.感情用事型者在體適能中之手球擲遠,較安祥機警型者為優;而在30秒仰臥起坐則遜於安祥機警型者。 9.怯懦型者在體適能中之引體向上、手球擲遠及4X20公尺折返跑等項目, 遠遜於果斷型者;而在1000公尺長跑項目上則優於果斷型者。 |
英文摘要 | The subject of this study is to investigate 120 players including sixty handball players and sixty university students. They are analyzed in the light of personal data (height, weight, shoulder width, arms length, rump width, and palm width,) Cattell's Sixteen Personality Factors Questionaire and Physical Fitness testing and the Author's own notes taking during the tournament. The purpose of this paper is to make a comparison between players and common students in physique, physical fitness and personality traits. The comparisons are also selected as the reference of training players. All the data are run by the VAXII-850-SPSS program of Computer Center of Chung Yuan. Christian University, and all the infqrmation, statistically studied, bring forth the following conclusions: 1.In physique, the handball players are superior to the students in height, weight, shoulder width, arms width, and palm width. 2. In physical fitness, the players are superior to the students in 50-meter sprint, 4x20 meter shuttle run, pull up, handball throwing, and 1000-metcr distance run. 3. In personality traits, the scores of independence (Q2) and determination (IV) of the players are lower than the 'students. However; the scores of the players are higherthan that of the students insociable (A),excitement (F), perseverance (G), venturesomeness (H), extroversion (IJ). 4. In physical fitness, the players are superior to the students in 50 meter sprint, 4X10 meter shuttle run, truck forward fiexion and 1000 meter distance run. However, the players are far behind the students in handball throwing, 30-second situps and 4X20 meter shuttle run. 5. In physique, the arms lengths of the handfall players are superior to those of the students in common. Butin the factors of weight, rump, width and palm width, the players are inferior to the studens. 6. The scores of intelligence of the players are lower than that of the students in personality traits. 7. In the correlation with physique, physical fitness,and personality traits, the husky-type players are much different from the other type of athletes in weight, rump width and standing long jump. 8. The emotional athletes are superior to the alert atbletes in physical fitness of handball tbrowing. However, the emotional atbletes are inferior to tbe alert athletes in 30-second situp. 9. The coward atbletes are superior to the determinate athletes in physical fitness of 1000 meter distance run, but inferior to the determinate athletes in pull up, handball tbrowing, and 4X20 meter shuttle run. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。