查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 制度經濟學的精義--為紀念吳老師貞盦先生逝世十週年而作
- 范伯倫[Thorstein Veblen]對現代經濟體制的分析
- 國軍政戰制度與中共軍隊政工制度之比較
- 論大陸公司法上有關有限責任公司之概念與特性
- 導師對標竿典範導師制度實施之態度分析--以中臺科技大學為例
- 戰時經濟體制中的物價問題與配給制度
- 戰時經濟體制下配給制度的實施
- Green Policy-Driven Closed-Loop Supply Chain for Recycling of Economically-Disadvantaged Recycled Materials
- 股東會通訊投票制度之研究
- 從時間/空間的建構模式談《和泉式部日記》之戀
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 制度經濟學的精義--為紀念吳老師貞盦先生逝世十週年而作=The Essence of the Institutional Economics in Memory of Professor Kan Wu |
---|---|
作者 | 施建生; Shih, Chien-sheng; |
期刊 | 東吳經濟商學學報 |
出版日期 | 20000600 |
卷期 | 29 2000.06[民89.06] |
頁次 | 頁15-29 |
分類號 | 550.1878 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 經濟體制; 制度; 經濟價值; 金錢價值; 常態概念; 過程概念; Economic system; Institution; Economic value; Pecuniary value; Preconception of normality; Preconception of process; |
中文摘要 | 制度經濟學是美國學人范伯倫在二十世紀之初所創立的?當吳老師於1930年代初期在美國留學時,此種經濟學應很流行? 對於涵括經濟學,范伯倫自稱為「演化的」或「文化的」經濟學。它的任務是在解釋經濟體制的性質。他認為經濟體制是一個演變的過程,是整個社會體制中的一部分。我們必須將經濟體制視為一個過程,研究其如何形成以及如何發展才能對之有充分暸解。 在范伯倫研究經濟學期間,馬夏爾的「經濟學原理J(1890)是傳統經濟學的 典範。范氏則對之嚴加批評。馬夏爾將經濟研究體制視為一個靜止的機制,認為其中有一股力量的存在以促進其均衡的產生」他認為這種對於經濟學的看法是不切實際的,因為這是基於現實世界之性質的一個不確切的概念而產生的。范氏認為如果經濟學家能以「過程的概念」為基礎來從事經濟分析,自可對縣現實世界有較切實的暸解。因為有了這種觀念之後,他們自能將經濟體制做為一個演變的過程來分析,這樣可以領悟到其中的經濟活動永遠是變動的,發展的,衝突的,而不是一些短暫的現象。 |
英文摘要 | Institutional economics began to be formulated by Thorestein Veblen at the turn of the century. It became very popular when Professor Kan Wu was studying economics in the United States during the early 1930s. Veblen described his economics as "evolutionary" or "cultural" economics. The function of this kind of economics is to study the nature of economic system. In his analysis, the economic system is an evolving process that is a part of the larger total social system. Veblen asserted that it is necessary to regard the economic system can be fully understood by inquiring into how it came to be what it is,and by investigating the forces that are shaping its future. During much of Veblen's career as an economist, Alfred Marshall's Principles of Economics (1890) was typical of the conventional economics, which was the subject of severe criticism by him. Accounting to Marshall, the economic system was not an evolving process but a static mechanism. The main feature of this economic mechanism was its tendency to establish a equilibrium. Veblen believed that this view of the economic system was inadequate, because it was based upon an unsatisfactory preconception as to the nature of the real world. Veblen explained that economics would come closer to the real world if their economic analysis based upon a preconception of process. Such a preconception would cause them to view the economic system as an evolving process, in which change, development and conflict were permanent rather than transitory features of economic activity. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。