查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 重探太巴塱部落的空間慣習:作為東亞觀念史/概念史的批判性補遺=Revisiting Spatial Practices in Tafalong: A Critical Supplement to East Asia Conceptual History |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 林榮康; | 書刊名 | 東亞觀念史集刊 |
| 卷 期 | 23 2025.12[民114.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁353+355-404 |
| 分類號 | 536.337 |
| 關鍵詞 | 太巴塱部落; 空間慣習; 觀念混成; 地名政治; 東亞觀念史/概念史; Tafalong community; Spatial practices; Conceptual hybridization; Toponymic politics; East Asian conceptual history; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.29425/JHIEA.202512_(23).0008 |
| 中文摘要 | 本研究以花蓮縣太巴塱部落為民族誌場域,探討其空間慣習如 何在日本殖民統治與戰後國民政府的現代治理體系下,歷經命名替 換、語義剝離與地景知識的邊緣化等過程。透過厚描法記錄地名歌 謠、儀式空間與口傳語彙實踐,本文指出:太巴塱的空間知識不僅 為文化實作,更可視為具備歷史層疊性與語義張力的地方觀念系 統。文章結合Reinhart Koselleck(1923-2006)的「語義張力」、 劉禾(Lydia Liu)的「觀念混成」與James Scott(1936-2024)的 「隱形文本」等理論視角,批判東亞觀念史╱概念史中長期以漢字 文本與帝國知識為中心的局限。本文主張,原住民族的空間實踐應 被視為觀念史╱概念史書寫的主體之一,不僅補遺現有敘事,更可 能重構以部落實踐為起點的「去中心化觀念史╱概念史」範式。 |
| 英文摘要 | This study takes the Tafalong community in Hualien County as an ethnographic site to examine how its spatial practices have undergone processes of toponymic replacement, semantic detachment, and the marginalization of landscape knowledge under Japanese colonial rule and the postwar modern governance system of the Nationalist government. Through thick description documenting place-name songs, ritual spaces, and oral vocabulary practices, this paper argues that Tafalong’s spatial knowledge constitutes not only a form of cultural practice but also a localized conceptual system characterized by historical layering and semantic tension. By integrating Koselleck’s notion of “semantic tension,” Lydia Liu’s concept of “conceptual hybridity,” and James Scott’s theory of “hidden transcripts,” the article critiques the long-standing limitations of East Asian intellectual history that center on sinographic texts and imperial knowledge frameworks. This study contends that indigenous spatial practices should be recognized as one of the primary subjects in conceptual historiography, not merely to supplement existing narratives but potentially to reconstruct a “decentralized conceptual history” paradigm originating from tribal practices. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。