查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 基於佚書的詞史重構--論詞譜、詞韻文獻的系統性散佚=Reconstructing Ci-Poetry History through Lost Works: On the Systematic Dispersal of Cipu and Ciyun Literature |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 王琳夫; | 書刊名 | 人文中國學報 |
| 卷 期 | 41 2025.12[民114.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁57-80 |
| 分類號 | 852 |
| 關鍵詞 | 詞譜; 詞韻; 佚書; 詞律; 詞學史; Cipu; Ciyun; Lost works; Ci Lü; History of ci-poetry studies; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 詞譜、詞韻文獻存在系統性的散佚現象,人們熟知的《詞律》、《詞林正韻》等傳世刻本只是學術史有限的一部分。沈璟、沈謙、朱彝尊、納蘭性德、周篔、樓儼、程夢星、周濟、姚燮、戈載、譚獻、鄭文焯、劉毓盤等著名詞人學者都曾編纂譜韻之書,可惜皆未能流傳。據筆者稽考統計,明清以來至少有115種詞譜、詞韻已經散佚。其中很多著作有足以改寫學術史的獨特價值,但由於原書散佚,今日已鮮爲人知。萬樹以前還有很多水平較高的研究型詞譜,結合稀見稿抄本文獻與散佚著作可以看到以往很多被歸到《詞律》之上的“首創之功”並不恰當。浙派以聲律見長,今日確鮮有詞譜聞見,其實浙派詞人也曾有很多詞譜著作,可惜因爲種種原因流散殆盡。杜文瀾《校刊詞律》、徐本立《詞律拾遺》也只是《詞律》修訂史的冰山一角,歷史上類似著作的數量極多,只是大部分都已經失散。還有很多詞韻佚著也頗具特色,從學術史書寫的角度來説,具有不可替代的價值。造成譜韻之書普遍散佚的根本原因是其自限性導致的内容高度重複。文獻流散、史事湮没,後人不知曉前人的努力,又會繼續重複前人已經做過的工作。理清問題的歷史因革是打破循環的開端。 |
| 英文摘要 | Cipu (ci-poetry manuals) and ciyun (ci rhyme books) have undergone systematic dispersal. Canonical printed editions such as Ci Lü and Cilin Zhengyun represent only a limited segment of scholarly history. Eminent ci poets and scholars including Shen Jing, Shen Qian, Zhu Yizun, Nalan Xingde, Zhou Yun, Lou Yan, Cheng Mengxing, Zhou Ji, Yao Xie, Ge Zai, Tan Xian, Zheng Wenzhuo, and Liu Yupan, compiled such works, but these works have all been lost. This study bibliographically identifies 115 lost works of cipu and ciyun from the Ming-Qing period. Many possessed unique value sufficient to reshape academic discourse, but their dispersal has rendered them obscure. Research-oriented cipu of high caliber predating Wan Shu existed; cross-examining rare manuscripts and lost works reveals that numerous "original contributions" attributed to Ci Lü are untenable. Zhe School poets, renowned for tonal prosody, actually produced significant cipu now lost to history. Du Wenlan's Collated Ci Lü and Xu Benli's Supplement to Ci Lü are mere fragments of Ci Lü's revision history, with most analogous works have been lost. Many lost ciyun also exhibit distinctive features indispensable to academic historiography. The self-limiting nature of Cipu and Ciyun induced high levels of- redundancy in content. As texts vanished and history faded, later scholars unknowingly repeated predecessors' work. Clarifying this core mechanism initiates the cycle's rupture. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。