查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- From Overlapping Interests to Behavior Alignment: U.S.-Japan-Philippines Minilateralism and the Balance of Threat during the Biden Administration
- 重新檢視瓦特的聯盟理論
- 柔性平衡理論之研究
- 從拜登「中東行」論美國的聯盟戰略
- 國際關係研究中的失衡觀點:學理探析與實務檢證
- 美國「霸權均勢」戰略下的權力挑戰--現實主義途徑之分析
- 川普能重構亞洲權力平衡?--解析美國印太戰略的虛實
- 東南亞區域和平的潛在威脅:南中國海問題之研究
- 五十年的「中」、美、蘇(俄)關係
- 亞太安全環境對兩岸關係與臺灣安全的影響
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | From Overlapping Interests to Behavior Alignment: U.S.-Japan-Philippines Minilateralism and the Balance of Threat during the Biden Administration=從利益重疊到行為一致:解釋拜登政府時期美日菲小多邊合作與威脅平衡及其戰略意涵 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 姚宏旻; | 書刊名 | 遠景基金會季刊 |
| 卷 期 | 26:4 2025.10[民114.10] |
| 頁 次 | 頁95-147 |
| 分類號 | 578.52 |
| 關鍵詞 | 小多邊主義; 結盟選擇; 權力平衡; 威脅平衡; 印太地區; Minilateralism; Choice of alliance; Balance of power; Balance of threats; Indo-Pacific; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| 中文摘要 | 隨著中美於印太地區的競爭加劇,自2023年起,美日菲三國互動越加頻繁,合作亦日益深化。結盟為戰略競爭中的關鍵能力,故當美日菲小多邊合作逐漸成形,便被視為反映區域權力轉變的表現。然而,值得深究的是,為何某些國家會選擇與特定國家結盟呢?本文採國際關係中的「威脅平衡」理論,探討日本與菲律賓為何調整中立位置的「避險」策略,並轉向與美國深化合作,但卻未採取所謂「印太版北約」的合作倡議,而改選擇較小規模的小多邊合作機制。透過分析此一趨勢,本文期望為印太地區的安全政策制定者提供可能之參考與啟示。 |
| 英文摘要 | During the Joe Biden administration, the Philippines, Japan, and the U.S. engaged in more frequent and strengthened exchanges from 2023 amid the intensified Sino-U.S. rivalry in the Indo-Pacific. In any strategic competition, the ability to form alliances is a valuable asset, and the emerging U.S.-Japan-Philippines alliance was seen as a reflection of these power dynamics. But why do some states form alliances against particular states in this region? This paper explores this strategic development in the Indo-Pacific political landscape and employs the perspective of the balance of threats in the discipline of International Relations to investigate the following questions. Firstly, given that China has been perceived as an economic powerhouse in Asia, why have Japan and the Philippines shifted away from a hedging posture of maintaining a neutral position, which the small and middle powers in Asia have traditionally welcomed? In addition, while talk of creating a major collective security alliance - a so-called Indo- Pacific NATO - has always been prevalent in Asia, the decision to form, instead, a small-group alliance among the U.S., Japan, and the Philippines, known as minilateralism, also puzzles security observers. Finally, this paper offers some implications and suggestions to security policy-makers relevant to the region. By analytically dissecting the process of the U.S.-Japan-Philippines minilateralism during the Biden administration, this paper hopes to conceptualize possible trends and reflect the developing geopolitical tendencies in the Indo-Pacific. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。