查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 人工智慧與土地法:從裁量到即時處分的雙軌檢驗與制度挑戰=Artificial Intelligence and Land Law: The Two-Track Test and Institutional Challenges from Discretion to Immediate Measures |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 劉皓仁; | 書刊名 | 科際整合月刊 |
| 卷 期 | 10:10 2025.10[民114.10] |
| 頁 次 | 頁45-61 |
| 分類號 | 554.1 |
| 關鍵詞 | 人工智慧; 土地法; 行政裁量; 即時處分; 演算法比例原則; 法治國原則; 文化資產保存; 數位治理; Artificial intelligence; AI; Land Law; Administrative discretion; Immediate measures; Algorithmic proportionality; Rule of law; Cultural heritage preservation; Digital governance; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文旨在探討人工智慧(AI)在土地法領域中的應用與挑戰,聚焦於行政裁量與即時處分的邊界。2024年《土地法》第14條修正後,文化主管機關可能依賴AI模型評估古蹟保存風險,政府亦規劃透過AI影像辨識即時觸發即時處分。AI雖能提升效率,但同時衝擊法治國的核心價值。透過案例與法理分析,本文提出「雙軌檢驗」:裁量型AI應受「演算法比例原則」檢驗,即時型AI則須符合「急迫性、必要性、事後補正」的三階要件,並確保可受司法審查。本文將國際AI治理經驗延伸到台灣土地行政,凸顯AI是對行政法理的壓力測試,而非單純技術工具。研究建議建立AI評估報告義務、完善補救機制及實施分級治理,以兼顧行政效率與權利保障。 |
| 英文摘要 | The purpose of this article is to explore the application and challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the field of land law, focusing on the boundary between administrative discretion and real-time disposition. after the amendment of Article 14 of the Land Law in 2024, cultural authorities may rely on AI models to assess the risk of preservation of monuments, and the government is planning to trigger real-time disposition through image recognition by AI. although AI can enhance efficiency, it also affects the core value of the rule of law. This paper proposes a 'two-track test' through case and jurisprudence analyses: discretionary AI should be subject to the 'algorithmic proportionality principle', while real-time AI should meet the three-phase requirements of 'urgency, necessity, and corrections after the fact', and be subject to judicial scrutiny. This paper extends the international AI governance experience to land administration in Taiwan, highlighting that AI is a stress test for administrative jurisprudence rather than a purely technical tool. The study proposes the establishment of an AI evaluation report obligation, the improvement of the remedial mechanism, and the implementation of hierarchical governance, in order to balance administrative efficiency and the protection of rights. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。