查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 中共軍演的認知作戰之探討--以「聯合利劍2024A、2024B」為例=A Study on the Cognitive Warfare of PLA Military Exercises: The Case of 'Joint Sword 2024A and 2024B' |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 陳珮嘉; 林政榮; | 書刊名 | 國防雜誌 |
| 卷 期 | 40:3 2025.09[民114.09] |
| 頁 次 | 頁55-86 |
| 分類號 | 592.1 |
| 關鍵詞 | 中共軍演; 防衛韌性; 認知作戰; 全民國防教育; PLA military exercises; National defense resilience; Cognitive warfare; National defense education; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.6326/NDJ.202509_40(3).0003 |
| 中文摘要 | 中共於2024年「聯合利劍2024A、2024B」系列軍演,除展現對我國武力威懾外, 亦結合資訊操控、輿論引導與對主權正當性的敘事操控等手段,實施多層次的認知作 戰。本文以觀察其策略演變特徵對我國的影響為觀察基礎,運用比較歷史研究法與文 獻分析法,剖析中共認知戰略的演進趨勢與操作模式,揭示其「軍演常態化」、「 分眾敘事操作」與「灰色地帶滲透」等特徵。研究發現,中共透過情緒操控與認知混 淆,試圖削弱我國社會對軍事威脅的敏感度,並藉由經濟利誘與文化滲透,營造對中 共友善的輿論氛圍。此種低強度、隱蔽性高的作戰模式,已逐步影響我國社會凝聚力 與決策韌性。為因應此一挑戰,我國應持續鞏固跨部會整合協作機制,強化全民國防 教育與媒體識讀訓練,並從國際合作、法治防線、經濟安全與數位治理等方面,發展 長期的防衛體系,確保我國國家安全與戰略自主權。 |
| 英文摘要 | In 2024, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) conducted the "Joint Sword 2024A/B" military exercises, combining coercive signaling toward the Republic of China (Taiwan) with multi-layered cognitive warfare, including information manipulation, narrative framing, and legitimacy-undermining tactics aimed at sovereignty erosion. Using the Republic of China's responses to these military exercises as an empirical basis, this study adopts a comparative historical analysis and documentary research approach to examine the CCP's evolving cognitive warfare strategy, highlighting its features of military drill normalization, segmented narrative operations, and gray-zone infiltration. The findings indicate that the CCP seeks to reduce Taiwans sensitivity to military threats through emotional manipulation and cognitive distortion, while simultaneously fostering pro-CCP sentiment via economic inducements and cultural penetration. These low-intensity, covert tactics have gradually eroded societal cohesion and weakened strategic resilience. The study underscores the imperative for robust interagency coordination, strategic communication, national defense education, and media literacy. It also calls for the development of long-term protective frameworks encompassing international cooperation, legal safeguards, economic security, and digital governance to effectively safeguard national security and preserve strategic autonomy. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。