查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 政府打炒房有用嗎?民眾對於「預售屋禁止轉讓」措施之意見類型分析=Is the Governmental Crackdown on the Real Estate Speculation Policy Effective? Analysis of the Public Opinion Classification on the Measure of Prohibition in Transferring Pre-sale Houses |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 吳綉絹; | 書刊名 | 中國行政評論 |
| 卷 期 | 31:3 2025.09[民114.09] |
| 頁 次 | 頁96-125 |
| 分類號 | 554.8 |
| 關鍵詞 | 房價; 投資或投機客; 讓與或轉售; 政策利害關係人; Q方法論; Housing prices; Investment or speculation; Transfer or resale; Policy stakeholders; Q methodology; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.6635/cpar.202509_31(3).0004 |
| 中文摘要 | 近年全台房價高速飆漲,引發民怨。由於「預售屋」具有建築設備新穎、低自備、延長購屋金準備期限及延緩貸款壓力等優勢,成為置產族購屋決策之重要誘因。但也吸引許多投資或投機客進場,於簽約後並於交屋前轉售牟利,預售屋轉售成為政府認為是炒作並導致高房價原因之一。面對此議題,政府於2023年修正平均地權條例,其中一項為「預售屋禁止讓與或轉售」措施(以下簡稱該措施):2023年7月1日以後購入預售屋簽約後,於交屋前原則上禁止轉讓。這項措施引起政策利害關係人廣泛討論。影響房價因素眾多,對於此次政府「打炒房」政策,呈現不同觀點且眾說紛云,但隱於個人預期心理及主觀意見往往不易觀察。民眾對於該措施是否有效之心態,不僅影響個人規劃及資產配置考量因素或選項,實為影響該措施效應之重要因素,容有探討之必要。本文以「預售屋契約禁止轉讓」為研究範圍,探討問題為:民眾對於預售屋禁止轉讓措施,是否有信心能達到該政策目的。運用Q方法論進行主體性資料蒐集和分析,經本研究歸納為三種意見類型,整體顯示政策效果未如預期,與多數學者及政府見解顯著落差。最後,針對自住、租屋及恐慌需求者之意見,提出政府應留意排擠效應、建構租賃制度及增加供給等政策建議。 |
| 英文摘要 | In recent years, housing prices have skyrocketed and caused widespread public dissatisfaction in Taiwan. Due to its advantages-modern building facilities, low initial payments, extended preparation time for homebuyers, and reduced immediate loan pressure-presale housing has become an attractive option for property buyers. However, it has also drawn many investors and speculators who purchase units and resell them for profit before the official handover, and led the government to identify presale house transfers as one of the key factors contributing to speculation and soaring prices.To address this issue, the government amended the Equalization of Land Rights Act in 2023, including a policy that prohibits the transfer or resale of presale houses (hereafter referred to as the measure) , that is, after July 1, 2023, presale houses cannot be transferred before the official handover. This measure has sparked extensive debate among stakeholders and the general public. Given the many factors influencing housing prices, public opinions on the government's real estate speculation policy vary widely. Individual psychological expectations and subjective perspectives, though influential, are often difficult to be observed. People's confidence in the effectiveness of the measure not only impacts personal planning and asset allocation decisions but also plays a crucial role in determining its overall impact, making it a subject worthy of discussion. This study focuses on the prohibition of presale house transfers and seeks to answer the question, "Do people believe this measure can effectively achieve its intended policy goals?" By utilizing Q methodology for data collection and analysis, This study categorizes these opinions into three types, demonstrating that the overall policy effect has not met expectations and significantly diverging from the views of most scholars and the government. Finally, by addressing the concerns of those owning residential houses, renting houses, and the buyer'spanic buyers, the study proposes that the government should pay attention to the crowding-out effect, establish the real estate leasehold system and increase house-supply. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。