查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 國中教師對學生聲音的詮釋與應對策略之研究=Understanding and Responding to Student Voice: An Ethnographic Study of Junior High School Teachers' Interpretations and Strategic Approaches |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 曾碩彥; 謝艾芸; | 書刊名 | 台灣教育研究期刊 |
| 卷 期 | 6:3 2025.05[民114.05] |
| 頁 次 | 頁253-286 |
| 分類號 | 524.5 |
| 關鍵詞 | 國中教師; 教師應對策略; 學生聲音; Junior high school teachers; Student voices; Teacher response strategies; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 在十二年國教課綱強調學生主體性的教育改革脈絡下,理解教師如何詮釋 與回應學生聲音,已成為當前教育實踐的重要課題。本研究以一群都會地區的國 中教師為對象,採用民族誌研究方法,描述教師對於學生聲音的分類及其應對策 略。研究發現,教師對於學生聲音的理解包括吵吵鬧鬧的聲音、表達訴求的聲音、 回饋評估的聲音及尋找夥伴關係的聲音,從而教師展現出多樣化的應對策略,包 括了主動傾聽、代為發聲、蒐集、接納改進以及討論、調整和改變。透過探究與 歸納教師對學生聲音的理解與應對策略過程中,分析出學生參與程度包括了爭 取表達、被動引導和不經意參與等三個層次。此外,研究也發現教師對學生聲音 的理解與詮釋深受教育脈絡影響,包括:學校組織結構與文化對教師專業自主的 制約、傳統師生權力關係對學生表達的限制,以及十二年國教課綱強調學生主體 性下的教育改革脈絡。此有助於教師能更精確的掌握學生的學習需求與期望,進 而促進學生參與和學習動機,最後分析當前學校及教師權力關係制約下,教師在 理解及回應學生聲音時之真實與有效性的限制與反思。本研究依結論提出相關 建議,以期在教師專業發展中應了解學生聲音的價值,政策支持方面提供教師相 關資源與情感的支持,以促進教學實踐提升學生的參與度和學習成果。 |
| 英文摘要 | Under the context of educational reform emphasizing student subjectivity in the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education, understanding how teachers interpret and respond to student voices has become a significant issue in current educational practice. This research describes teachers' categorization of student voices and their corresponding strategies of a group of junior high school teachers in urban areas. Through long-term observation and in-depth interviews, the results indicate that teachers categorize student voices into noisy voices, voices expressing demands, voices providing feedback, and voices seeking partnerships. Teachers employ diverse strategies, such as actively listening, speaking on behalf of students, collecting information, and making adjustments. The study identifies three levels of student participation and reveals that teachers' interpretation of student voices is significantly influenced by educational contexts, including school organizational structures, traditional teacher-student power relationships, and curriculum reform emphasizing student subjectivity. The research concludes by providing recommendations for teacher professional development and policy support. It suggests that teachers should recognize the value of student voices while incorporating them into teaching practices, supported by necessary resources and emotional support. These efforts aim to create a more inclusive learning environment and improve student participation and learning outcomes. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。