頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 康德對萊布尼茨神義論問題的視角轉移=Kant's Shifting Perspective to the Problem of Leibniz's Theodicy |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 周小龍; | 書刊名 | 道風:基督教文化評論 |
| 卷 期 | 60 2024.01[民113.01] |
| 頁 次 | 頁243-274 |
| 分類號 | 147.45 |
| 關鍵詞 | 神義論; 康德; 萊布尼茨; 宇宙整體; 人類中心; Theodicy; Kant; Leibniz; Cosmic whole; Anthropocentric; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 神義論是康德哲學始終關注的問題。在其與萊布尼茨的關係上,學界始終存在「革命論」和「繼承論」兩種解釋方案。本文認為,從前批判時期到一七九一年的神義論論文,康德的視野發生了從宇宙整體向人類中心的轉變,與此同時,人類的德福一致成為了他神義論的核心訴求,從而愈來愈偏離萊布尼茨的神義論思路,這也給他的神義論方案造成了內在的張力。因此,本文既不同意「繼承論」的主張,也不同意「革命論」所預設的對康德神義論的推崇態度,而是客觀地描述康德在上述轉變中可能遭遇的理論困境。 |
| 英文摘要 | Theodicy is a constant concern in Kant's philosophy. There have been two interpretations of Kant's relationship with Leibniz; the "revolutionary theory" and the "inheritance theory". This article argues that, from the precritical period to the theodicy-treatise of 1791, Kant's horizon shifted from the cosmic whole to the anthropocentric, and at the same time, the harmony between virtue and the happiness of human beings became the core demand of his theodicy, thus deviating more and more from Leibniz's theistic thought, which also caused an inherent tension in his theistic scheme. Therefore, this article neither agrees with the claim of "inheritance theory" nor with the attitude of esteeming Kant's theodicy as predetermined by "revolutionary theory", but objectively describes the theoretical dilemma that Kant may have encountered in the abovementioned transformation. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。