查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Engagement Reimagined: Exploring Community Participation in Blended Professional Learning Communities with Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches
- 迎接新世紀的教師心靈開拓
- 開放大學教師專業成長與發展性教師評鑑
- Processes Supporting Teacher Change Within a School-Based Professional Development Program
- 從九年一貫課程談「學校本位課程發展」與「學校本位教師專業發展」的同步發展策略
- 國小教師教學改變之研究
- 教師在職進修的新趨勢--學校本位的教師專業發展
- 從教師甄選談教師的專業發展
- 美國教師薪給制度改革趨勢之研究
- 在職教師數學專業發展方案的協同行動研究
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | Engagement Reimagined: Exploring Community Participation in Blended Professional Learning Communities with Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches=重新想像社群參與:探索由上而下和由下而上的混成式教師專業學習社群 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 蕭若綺; | 書刊名 | 教育傳播與科技研究 |
| 卷 期 | 137 2025.04[民114.04] |
| 頁 次 | 頁51-71 |
| 分類號 | 522.2 |
| 關鍵詞 | 社群角色; 專業能力需求; 優質學習投入; 教師專業發展; 由上而下和由下而上的混成式專業學習社群; Community roles; Need for competence; Quality learning engagement; Teacher professional development; Top-down and bottom-up blended professional learning communities; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| DOI | 10.6137/RECT.202504_(137).0004 |
| 中文摘要 | 教師專業發展正經歷轉變,越來越多教師參加混成式專業學習社群(blended professional learning communities, B-PLCs)。B-PLCs結合線上與線下學習,本研究主張良好的B-PLCs要先滿足教師增能的需求(satisfaction of need for competence, SNC),在參與歷程中賦予其社群角色或積極參與活動的機會,以達到優質的學習投入(quality learning engagement, QLE);經由QLE,教師可能的收穫包含教學新知(new pedagogical knowledge, NPK)、利他與幸福感。本研究以問卷調查302名來自11個B-PLCs的中學教師,建立QLE為中介變項的結構方程模型,利用拔靴法測試模型。如假設預期,QLE部分中介從SNC到幸福感的路徑,而QLE更完全中介從SNC到NPK和利他的路徑;SNC確實是QLE的前提要件,二者合力使參與社群教師有所收穫。不過,教師應該參與由上而下或由下而上的B-PLCs呢?將這11個社群依據運作模式,分為由上而下B-PLCs(top-down B-PLCs, TDBPLCs)和由下而上B-PLCs(bottom-up B-PLCs, BUBPLCs)進行比較,發現TDBPLCs和BUBPLCs在各變項的差異不大。t檢定發現BUBPLCs組的SNC得分高於TDBPLCs組;QLE、NPK、利他與幸福感則沒有差異;另以卡方檢驗檢查發現TDBPLCs組在社群扮演社群角色的數量比BUBPLCs組多。本研究發現無論是TDBPLCs或BUBPLCs都能有效促進教師積極參與社群、提升教師知識、並誘發相似程度的滿意度。這凸顯了允許教師依照個人需求和學習風格,彈性選擇專業成長方式的重要性。 |
| 英文摘要 | Teacher professional development is shifting its paradigm, with a growing number of teachers attending blended professional learning communities (B-PLCs). The present study argues that learning engagement (LE) should be of quality, which is indicated by effortfully engaging in community activities or practically playing community roles. A total of 302 K-12 teachers from 11 B-PLCs were invited to complete a survey questionnaire. Two mediation models using the bootstrap method were tested to see if mediation effects with quality learning engagement (QLE) as the mediator existed. As expected, QLE partially mediated the pathway from the satisfaction of need for competence (SNC) to well-being; surprisingly, QLE completely mediated the pathways from SNC to new pedagogical knowledge (NPK) and altruism, indicating its critical role. SNC acted as a critical condition for QLE to manifest its effect in B-PLCs. An unsettled debate is whether teachers benefit more from participating in top-down B-PLCs (TDBPLCs) or bottom-up B-PLCs (BUBPLCs). The 11 B-PLCs were then divided into two groups based on their top-down or bottom-up approaches: TDBPLCs vs. BUBPLCs. A series of t-tests were used to compare group differences. More similarities than differences were found between teachers in TDBPLCs and BUBPLCs. Specially, no differences were found in QLE, NPK, altruism, and well-being, but BUBPLCs scored higher on SNC than TDBPLCs. Chi-square tests were also used to examine whether participants in the two groups played different amounts of community roles. Results showed TDBPLCs played more roles than BUBPLCs. It suggests that both top-down and bottom-up approaches were effective in promoting active engagement, advancing teacher knowledge, and deriving similar levels of mutual support and satisfaction. This finding underscores the importance of flexibility, allowing teachers to choose learning approaches that fit their needs and styles. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。