查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 保護規範理論的本土化條件=On the Conditions of the Localization of the Protection Norm Theory |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 何天文; | 書刊名 | 澳門法學 |
| 卷 期 | 2025:1=59 2025.03[民114.03] |
| 頁 次 | 頁79-95 |
| 分類號 | 588.16 |
| 關鍵詞 | 保護規範理論; 主觀訴訟; 原告資格; 主觀公權利; 本土化; Theory of protection norms; Subjective litigation; Plaintiff qualification; Subjective public rights; Conditions of the localization; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 我國是否具備保護規範理論所需的制度前提、理論儲備和實踐能力,決定著該理論在我國 行政審判實踐中能否順利引入和有效適用。從憲法根據、“合法權益”與合法性審查原則的體系解釋來 看,作為該理論適用前提的主觀訴訟構造已經具備。該理論背後的主觀公權利概念凸顯了公法的特質, 其作為原告資格的要件與我國公民行政法上的能動地位並不衝突。該理論在解釋對象和解釋方法上的改 進,適應了拓寬原告資格的時代潮流,調和了解釋結論開放性與法安定性之間的衝突。適用該理論所需 的基本權內部解釋效力在我國並無制度障礙,相應的法律解釋技術也可逐步培養。 |
| 英文摘要 | Whether or not China has the system prerequisites, theoretical reserves, and practical capabilities required to protect a normative theory determines whether the theory can be smoothly introduced and effectively applied in China's administrative trial practice. Judging from the systematic interpretation of the constitutional basis, "legitimate rights and interests," and the principle of legality review, the subjective litigation structure as a prerequisite for the application of this theory is already in place. The subjective public rights concept behind this theory highlights the characteristics of public law, and its qualifications for judicial protection do not conflict with the active status in civil administrative law. The improvement of the theory in the interpretation object and the interpretation method adapts to the trend of the times to broaden the plaintiff's qualifications, and effectively reconciles the validity and certainty of the interpretation conclusion. There are no institutional barriers to the effectiveness of the internal interpretation of the fundamental rights required to apply this theory, and corresponding legal interpretation techniques can be gradually cultivated. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。