頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 澳門仲裁發展的政策目標與實現路徑=The Policy Objectives and Implementation Pathways for the Development of Arbitration in Macao |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 呂冬娟; | 書刊名 | 澳門法學 |
| 卷 期 | 2024:4=58 2024.12[民113.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁131-145 |
| 分類號 | 589.42 |
| 關鍵詞 | 仲裁法; 仲裁機構; 仲裁規則; 仲裁員; Arbitration law; Arbitration institution; Arbitration rules; Arbitrator; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 今年是澳門地區回歸祖國25周年,得益於“一國兩制”的基本原則,澳門地區享有高度的 自治權,這為澳門地區的仲裁優勢的持續發揮提供了法治土壤,但澳門仲裁法及仲裁機構仍有空間提升 其對公眾的吸引力。因澳門現行仲裁制度在設計上與域外優秀的仲裁制度還存有比較大的差距,從而影 響了澳門仲裁公信力和區際和國際競爭力。這些問題在一定程度上制約了澳門仲裁的高質量發展和仲裁 在打造中葡經貿爭議國際仲裁中心方面作用的發揮,亟須修改完善。基於此,本文擬在梳理澳門仲裁制 度的基礎上,分析澳門仲裁法和仲裁機構中存在的問題及提出優化的建議,希冀對澳門仲裁制度進行適 度創新,使仲裁逐步上升為公眾認可的爭議解決方式,以期推動澳門仲裁的發展,以此提升澳門仲裁公 信力和區際及國際競爭力。 |
| 英文摘要 | 2024 marks the 25th anniversary of Macao’s return to the motherland. Based on the foundational principle of “one country, two systems”, the MSAR enjoys a high degree of autonomy, which confers the befitted breeding ground for MSAR’s endeavors in the remit of arbitration. However, the MSAR’s arbitration law and arbitration institutions still have room for improvement. There is still a yawning gap between the MSAR’s current arbitration system and the top-notch arbitration systems in force in other countries, which is detrimental to both the MSAR’s arbitration system credibility and its regional and international competitiveness. To some extent, the foregoing drawbacks have impaired the development of the MSAR’s arbitration. By the same token, the MSAR is not playing a pivotal role in the realm of international arbitration center for Sino-Portuguese economic and trade disputes as initially envisioned,which is something that deserves both to be remarked upon and frowned upon. Against this background, this paper seeks to parse the plethora of legal shortcomings that beset MSAR’s arbitration law and arbitration institutions while bringing forward a host of suggestions to overcome the pinpointed insufficiencies. Bearing this assertion very firmly in mind, this paper aims to unlock the multitudinous advantages of conciliatory means of dispute resolution (arbitration) in the MSAR. In this vein, this paper’s overriding goal is to spur the overall development of the MSAR’s arbitration system with a view to augmenting the MSAR’s arbitration credibility as a platform for solving disputes in the arena of international arbitration. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。