頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 規則銜接與創新:中國內地與澳門數據傳輸SCCs制度建構--以橫琴深合區為切入點=Rule Convergence and Innovation: The Construction of SCCs Regime for Data Transfer between Mainland China and Macau--Taking the Hengqin In-depth Cooperation Zone as the Entry Point |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 李浩; | 書刊名 | 澳門科技大學學報.人文社會科學版 |
| 卷 期 | 19:1 2025.03[民114.03] |
| 頁 次 | 頁77-120 |
| 分類號 | 584.31 |
| 關鍵詞 | 數據跨境傳輸; 標準合同條款; 規則銜接; 橫琴深合區; 制度創新; Cross-boundary data transfer; Standard contract clauses; Rule convergence; Hengqin In-depth Cooperation Zone; Institutional innovation; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.58664/mustjournal.2025.03.003 |
| 中文摘要 | 自〈通用數據保護條例〉(General Data Protection Regulation , GDPR)及〈施 雷姆斯案〉(Schrems Ⅱ)生效後,寰球數據流動進入標準合同條款時代。促進內 地與澳門特區的跨境數據傳輸,是建設「電子灣區」以及與葡語國家數字貿易港的 應有之義。SCCs 以其便捷性與實踐性,系現有法律工具箱中可推動先導性創新並打 破制度壁壘的首善之選。「9+1」傳輸結構僅為起點,SCCs 的規則銜接應指向「1+1+1」 的制度未來。兩地合同條款在包括有關概念、適用前提、具體內容及程序等諸多方 面存在差異。橫琴深合區具備頂層設計及「自下而上」的動態規範結構,在立法、 行政、司法上保留著相當的制度彈性,為兩地的合同條款規則銜接提供試驗平台; 其現有的體制改革經驗,如「一地兩檢」、法定機構的分工等,亦可作為 SCCs 系統 協同的參考。在充分認識到兩地制度性差異的前提下,以粵澳深度合作區的制度創 新為契機,可奠定標準合同條款基本原則與框架,消彌專業術語分歧,然後通過協 議推出樣本合同,在執委會內設機構負責監督執行,從而構建「規則共商、平台共 建、機構共管、成果共享」的聯動發展局面。如此可期實現對粵澳乃至區域信息產 業與居民福利的提升,同時有效保障數字人權,為跨境數據流動提供帶有中國特色 的「大灣區方案」。 |
| 英文摘要 | After the effectiveness of GDPR and the Schrems II case, the global data flow seems to have entered the “era of Standard Contractual Clauses”. Promoting cross- boundary data transmission between the mainland and the Macao Special Administrative Region is essential for building an “electronic bay area” and a digital trade port with Portuguese speaking countries. SCCs, with its convenience and practicality, are the top choice in the existing legal toolbox that can drive leading innovation and break institutional barriers. The “9+1” transmission structure is only the starting point, and the rule convergence of SCCs should point to the future of the “1+1+1” system. There are differences in terms of contractual clauses between the two regions, including relevant concepts, applicable prerequisites, specific content, and procedures. Hengqin In-Depth Cooperation Zone has a top-level design and a “bottom-up” dynamic normative structure, retaining considerable institutional flexibility in legislation, administration, and judiciary, providing a experimental platform for the rule convergence of contract clauses between the two regions; Its existing experience in institutional reform, such as “one place, two inspections” and the division of functions among statutory bodies, can also serve as a reference for SCCs system harmonization. On the premise of fully recognizing the institutional differences between the two regions, taking the institutional innovation of the Guangdong-Macao In-depth Cooperation Zone as an opportunity, the general principles and framework of standard contractual clauses can be established, and distinctions in professional terminology can be eliminated. Then, sample contracts can be launched through agreements, and institutions within the executive committee can be established to supervise and execute, thus building a interactive development status of “rule co- consultation, platform co-construction, institution co-management, and achievement co- sharing”. This can achieve an improvement in the information industry and residents' welfare in Guangdong, Macao, and even the region, while effectively safeguarding digital human rights, and providing a “Greater Bay Area Scheme” with Chinese characteristics for cross-boundary data flow. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。