頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 比較法視野下澳門行政法中的兩個重點問題研究=Research on Two Key Issues in Macau Administrative Law: A Comparative Perspective |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 牟效波; | 書刊名 | 澳門科技大學學報 |
| 卷 期 | 18:4 2024.12[民113.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-24 |
| 分類號 | 589.92 |
| 關鍵詞 | 澳門行政法; 行政機關; 制規權; 獨立行政法規; 行政行為的合法性標準; Macau administrative law; Administrative agencies; Rule-making power; Independent administrative regulation; Legality standards of administrative acts; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.58664/mustjournal.2024.12.001 |
| 中文摘要 | 本文對澳門行政法中行政機關的制規權,行政行為的合法性標準這兩個重點 問題進行了系統且深入的梳理,將其置於具有一定法治成熟度的我國內地、我國臺 灣地區、美國、法國、德國等國家和地區的相應制度中進行比較,審視其獨特性、 長處和不足。本文發現,澳門行政法中的行政行為合法性標準是嚴密的,不存在明 顯漏洞,能夠確保行政機關的行為處於法律之下,「權力偏差」這一較有特色的法律 術語的含義也為成熟的司法解釋和學說所澄清;然而,法律授予行政長官寬泛的獨 立行政法規制定權,卻使得行政機關的權力未能受到充分約束。此外,澳門行政法 區分無效行政行為和可撤銷行政行為的制度,為法、德等一些大陸法系國家所共用, 非常值得我國內地借鑒。 |
| 英文摘要 | This article systematically and deeply studies two key issues in the administrative law of Macau, namely the rule-making power of administrative agencies and the legality standards of administrative acts, and then analyzes them in a comparative perspective, examining their uniqueness, advantages and disadvantages. This article argues that the legality standards of administrative acts in Macau’s administrative law is strict, and there are no obvious loopholes, which can ensure that the actions of administrative agencies are under the law, and the meaning of the distinctive legal term “power deviation” has also been clarified by mature judicial interpretations and academic theories; However, the law grants the Chief Executive a broad power to formulate independent administrative regulations, which makes the power of the administrative branch not fully constrained. In addition, the approach of distinguishing invalid administrative acts from revocable administrative acts in Macau’s administrative law is shared by some civil law countries such as France and Germany, and it is very worthy of reference for the administrative law in the mainland of China. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。