查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 「消失的婦運」:障礙女性生育權在臺灣墮胎權運動中的缺席及其影響
- 公共空間中的性別正義與性壓迫:對臺灣婦運歷程的一些空間思考
- 婦運對兒童保護之影響
- 網路中的女性集結與動員初探
- 孫中山先生與民元後的婦女運動
- 叫「母親」太沈重?--論呂秀蓮對臺灣婦女運動的意義
- 評介Women in the Chinese Enlightenment: Oral and Textual Histories. [by 王政(Wang Zheng) (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1999)]
- 戰後初期臺灣婦女團體與婦運議題
- 近代中國婦女史研究的回顧--《近代中國婦女運動史》導言
- 婦女運動與運動婦女:評介《近代中國婦女運動史》[鮑家麟、呂芳上、游鑑明、李繼鋒著;陳三井主編 (近代中國出版社, 2000)]
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 「消失的婦運」:障礙女性生育權在臺灣墮胎權運動中的缺席及其影響=The Absentees in the Women's Rights Movements: The Absence of Reproductive Rights for Disabled Women and Its Implications in Taiwan's Abortion Rights Movement |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 戴靖芸; | 書刊名 | 女學學誌:婦女與性別研究 |
| 卷 期 | 55 2024.12[民113.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-52 |
| 分類號 | 544.54 |
| 關鍵詞 | 生育正義; 障礙女性主義; 優生保健法; 生育控制; 墮胎權; 婦女運動; Reproductive justice; Feminist theory of disability; Genetic Health Act; Eugenics; Abortion right; Women's rights movement; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.6255/JWGS.202412_(55).01 |
| 中文摘要 | 1984 年《優生保健法》的通過促使墮胎有條件合法化,婦女運動在其 中扮演舉足輕重的角色。然而,研擬《優生保健法》草案的過程中,在國 家人口政策的敘事下,優生學漸漸成為國家與民間的共識。本文透過障礙 女性主義(feminist theory of disability)與生育正義(reproductive justice) 的理論視角,以障礙女性生育權為思考核心,重訪這段在人口政策的陰影 下婦運追求墮胎有條件合法化的歷史,指出優生如何貫穿臺灣的人口政策 並成為《優生保健法》草案在立法院內僵持不下時的共通語言,民間婦運 又是如何透過對障礙者的刻板印象主張墮胎合法化。然而,婦運此種迎合 國家政策的漸進式策略,卻也付出了與優生共謀的代價─《優生保健 法》成為國家控制障礙者生育的重要法源依據,並持續否定障礙者、尤其 是障礙女性的生育。本文發現,《殘障福利法》與《身心障礙者保護法》 的「殘障預防/障礙預防」概念實際上受到《優生保健法》制定過程的影 響而內嵌優生思想;在《優生保健法》通過後,1990 年代的新家庭計畫轉 向針對包含障礙者在內的特殊群體;2000 年後《優生保健措施減免或補 助費用辦法》也選擇性地給予障礙者節育支持,儘管該辦法已受到批評, 卻仍未被刪除。 |
| 英文摘要 | In 1984, the enactment of the Genetic Health Act, literally translated as the “Eugenics and Health Act,” conditionally legalized abortion, with the women’s rights movement playing a significant role in this development. However, the drafting processes of the Genetic Health Act within the framework of national population policy gradually solidified eugenics as a consensus between the state and civil society. This article adopts the theoretical perspectives of the feminist theory of disability and reproductive justice to reexamine the history of the women’s reproductive rights movement, which aimed to decriminalize abortion within the context of national population policy. Eugenics became a prevailing discourse during a standstill in the legislation of the Genetic Health Act. The women’s rights movement tacitly accepted the state’s eugenics language and exploited the stereotype of disability to further its own goals of legalizing abortion. However, the incremental strategy of the women’s rights movement, aligned with the state’s policies, came at a cost—the Genetic Health Act became a crucial legal basis for the state to control the reproduction of disabled individuals, especially disabled women. The drafting process of the Welfare Law for Handicapped Persons and the Physically and Mentally Disabled Citizens Protection Act was heavily influenced by the drafting process of the Genetic Health Act and was highly embedded with eugenics. Following the enactment of the Genetic Health Act, the New Family Planning initiated in the 1990s shifted its focus to comprehensively improving population quality. In the 2000s, although criticized by Disabled People’s Organizations, the Regulations Governing the Expenses Reduction, Exemption or Subsidy of Genetic Health Measures solely provided support for contraception to particular groups, including disabled individuals, which denied the reproductive rights of the disabled. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。