查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 準今酌古:《四庫全書總目》非議顧炎武學術經世價值原因考論=Discussion on Siku Quanshu Zongmu's Criticism of the Practical Governance Value of Gu Yanwu's Academic Works |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 陳勳; | 書刊名 | 中國文學研究 |
| 卷 期 | 58 2024.07[民113.07] |
| 頁 次 | 頁175-232 |
| 分類號 | 018.16 |
| 關鍵詞 | 顧炎武; 四庫全書總目; 乾隆帝; 經世; 清代學術; Gu Yanwu; Siku Quanshu Zongmu; Emperor Qianlong; Practical governance; Qing dynasty academics; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.29419/SICL.202407_(58).0005 |
| 中文摘要 | 本文通過分析《四庫全書總目》對顧炎武著作之評議,首先了解《總目》經世觀與清中葉學風由「道」及「器」的趨勢互為影響,故偏重於「治法」之面向,於顧氏經世學問中的「治道」部分有所忽略。《總目》評論「治法」的取向,在乎「準今酌古」,於三代政制挪為今用持反對態度,對顧氏喜談三代,曾倡議復行封建,貶為缺乏應用價值的虛言,且引為迂闊之代表,僅承認顧氏之經史考據成果具有學術上的價值。而乾隆帝深度參與《總目》之編纂,且具備實政經驗,考察其詩文集,已屢屢強調「治法」當隨時勢變通之觀念,此與顧炎武發於亂世之際的偏激意見相枘鑿,當為《總目》之所本,而成為否定顧氏學術經世價值之內在原因。 |
| 英文摘要 | This article analyzes the critique of Gu Yanwu's (顧炎武) works in the Siku Quanshu Zongmu (四庫全書總目 General Catalogue of the Complete Library of the Four Treasuries). It first explores how the Zongmu's view on practical affairs and the academic trends of the mid-Qing period were influenced by the interaction between "dao" (principles) and "qi" (techniques), leading to a focus on "governance methods" and an oversight of Gu Yanwu's "dao of governance" in his practical scholarship. Zongmu's orientation towards "governance methods" was concerned with "applying ancient principles to contemporary practices," showing a resistance to the application of the political systems of the "Three Dynasties" (Xia, Shang, and Zhou) to the present. This contrasts with Gu Yanwu's admiration for the Three Dynasties and his advocacy for the revival of feudal practices, which the Zongmu dismissed as impractical and representing a narrow view. The Zongmu only acknowledged Gu Yanwu's achievements in historical and textual research for their academic value. Emperor Qianlong's (乾隆帝) deep involvement in the compilation of the Zongmu, coupled with his practical administrative experience, often emphasized the idea that "governance methods" should adapt to changing times. This perspective, which clashed with Gu Yanwu's radical views from a period of turmoil, likely influenced the Zongmu's stance and became an inherent reason for the denial of Gu Yanwu's academic value in practical governance. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。