查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 不連續的光譜:統獨立場測量效度的再檢視
- 臺灣人的民族認同/國家認同--評Memories of the Future: National Identity Issues and the Search for a New Taiwan[未來的記憶:國家認同議題及尋找新臺灣]
- 世代之間政治認同差異的圖像:以多重對應分析結合習慣領域視野進行的探索
- 老臺灣人vs新臺灣人:臺灣人認同世代差異之初探
- 中華民族論的演變
- 臺灣認同問題的弔詭
- 臺灣“新民族”“新國家”認同解析
- 變動政局中臺灣外省人的認同處境:以2004年總統選舉為觀察基點
- 論法蘭西“民族教師”拉維斯的鑄造國族事業
- 馮友蘭徹底的民族主義思想的形成和發展(一八九五∼一九四五)(1)
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 不連續的光譜:統獨立場測量效度的再檢視=A Discontinuous Spectrum: Reassessing the Validity of Measuring Unification-Independence Positions |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 劉正山; | 書刊名 | 臺灣政治學刊 |
| 卷 期 | 28:2 2024.12[民113.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-46 |
| 分類號 | 571.11 |
| 關鍵詞 | 統獨測量; 國家認同; 民族認同; 效度; 探索式資料分析; Unification-independence measure; State identity; National identity; Validity; Exploratory data analysis; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.6683/TPSR.202412_28(2).0001 |
| 中文摘要 | 自1990年以來,台灣民眾的統獨立場一直是研究台灣民眾選舉與投票行為的重要解釋變數。雖然多數學者已意識到統獨立場不全然等同於國家認同、民族認同與政黨認同,但它們之間(不)重疊的程度尚未得到足夠的檢視與討論,不少報導與評論仍習慣將統獨立場解讀為國家認同。統獨光譜的測量題預設了統與獨的二元對立性及測量選項之間的連續性,由此將光譜的中段稱作「維持現狀」。本文使用質性與量化的途徑,嘗試探索統獨立場測量的效度:質性方法從概念的重疊性著手,分析2011年一場焦點團體座談中不同政黨傾向受訪者在論述國號認同時,帶入統獨立場、民族認同與政黨認同的程度。量化途徑使用2020年所收集的全國性電訪調查資料(N=1,190),以多重對應分析方法解析這些測量題之間的潛在關聯以及統獨測量題選項之間的連續性。使用這兩個途徑的觀察結果都指向:統獨立場並未充份對應國家、民族與政黨認同,且其選項之間無明確的內在連結。這個「不連續光譜」的發現延續了學界過往對此議題的反思,並進一步提供國家認同研究者更多想像。 |
| 英文摘要 | Since the 1990s, Taiwanese citizens' unification-independence stances have been a critical variable in electoral and voting behavior studies. While scholars generally acknowledge that these stances are not entirely equivalent to state identity, national identity, or party identification, the degree of overlap among these dimensions remains underexplored. Many reports and commentaries continue to conflate unification-independence stances with state/national identity. The unification-independence spectrum assumes a binary opposition between unification and independence and continuity across response options, with the middle labeled as "maintaining the status quo." This study uses qualitative and quantitative methods to assess the validity of measuring unification-independence stances. Qualitative analysis examines conceptual overlaps through a 2011 focus group discussion, analyzing how respondents with different partisan leanings integrate unification-independence stances, national identity, and party identification into their views on state identity. The quantitative analysis applies multiple correspondence analysis to nationally representative survey data from 2020 (N=1,190) to evaluate latent associations among these measures and the continuity of response options. Both approaches reveal that unification-independence stances do not fully align with national, state, or partisan identities, and the scale's response options lack internal continuity. This finding of a "discontinuous spectrum" extends prior scholarly critiques and offers new insights for researchers studying national identity. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。