查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 被審議的傳統?編織作為原住民族傳統智慧創作專用權的理論與實務
- 原住民族傳統智慧創作之歸屬與運用:集體財產管理制度之探討
- 傳統智慧創作與特殊權利--評析「原住民族傳統智慧創作保護條例」
- 原住民族的智慧創作與專用:保護乎?限制乎?--臺北高等行政法院108年度原訴字第7號判決
- 原住民族傳統智慧創作專用權之權利保護客體--臺北高等行政法院108年度原訴字第7號判決評析
- 凡德皮三部曲--原住民族傳統習慣與原住民族權利
- 論原住民族智慧權保障機制之建構--以「原住民族傳統智慧創作保護條例草案」為例之探討
- 「原住民族傳統智慧創作保護條例」與身分性文化敘述:排灣族巴格達外(Pakedavai)家族之實踐
- 臺灣原住民族集體同意權之規範與實踐
- 原住民族傳統智慧創作保護條例與原住民族數位典藏
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 被審議的傳統?編織作為原住民族傳統智慧創作專用權的理論與實務=The Traditions under Review: Theories and Practice of Weaving as an Exclusive Rights of Indigenous Culture Creations |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 邱盈翠; | 書刊名 | 臺北大學法學論叢 |
| 卷 期 | 133 2025.03[民114.03] |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-62 |
| 分類號 | 588.29 |
| 關鍵詞 | 原住民族傳統智慧創作保護條例; 原住民族傳統智慧創作; 專用權; 原住民族編織; 本真性; 原住民族權利; 特殊權利; Protection Act for the Traditional Intellectual Creations of Indigenous Peoples; Indigenous traditional cultural creations; Exclusive rights; Indigenous weaving; Authenticity; Rights of indigenous peoples; Sui generis; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 原住民族傳統智慧創作保護條例(原創條例)是保護原住民族傳統 文化成果表達的特殊權利制度。為妥協主流社會對原住民族文化知識普 遍陌生,與後續侵權判定及訴訟效率需求之現實,在權利取得要件上, 採取了程序成本較高的登記要件主義。因而引發了削弱法律資源相對欠 缺之原住民族自主登記意願,以及因登記保護程序之規訓本質,扭曲原 住民族文化本真性的批評。 本文以賽德克族、太魯閣族、賽德克族山里(陶塞)部落、噶瑪蘭 族、邵族之編織及相關種類智慧創作之公告內容,分析原住民族社群如 何轉化異質性的保護制度為可近用之法律工具,避免了被質疑可能產生 之文化規訓結果。由這些智慧創作經認定與審議的結果,也可探知原住 民族社群參與原創條例的多元動機。智慧創作之財產權功能,其實並非 原住民族社群對該保護制度的主要期待。本文研究案例中,重新或強化 區隔他者與我群,賦與社群對傳統慣習、內部紀律與禁忌的詮釋權力, 可能才是原住民族社群取得智慧創作專用權的更重要目的。而在申請書 表中對編織工具、材料、圖案變化的寬容敘述,與歸屬權利範圍的自我 修正,也顯示出原住民族社群對文化變遷的現代認知。一種既舊又新的 原住民族文化本真性,在原創條例制度的發展中被逐漸成形。 |
| 英文摘要 | The Protection Act for the Traditional Intellectual Creations of Indigenous Peoples is a sui generis regime intending to protect the traditional cultural expressions of indigenous peoples. To compromise with the public ignorance of indigenous culture and the efficiency for the adjudicating court to convict a breach, the Protection Act elects registry as a sine quo non for the admission of the right, which however also ignites the criticism as defeating the indigenous peoples incentive to register due to their slim legal resource, and possible impeachment of their cultural authenticity through the official review of their application. This article uses the context of the traditional intellectual creations registered on weaving, namely of the Seediq, Truku, Tausa tribe of Seediq, Kebalan and Thao to analyze how indigenous communities, with the unfamiliar platform, to access and transform the legal apparatus to preserve authenticity and refrain from being culturally disciplined. The registered contents also reveal the multiple incentives of indigenous peoples envisage over the regime. Protection of private property is not among their significant prospects, but to delineate and reinforce the separation with others and respective authority to interpret and implement traditional customs and domestic disciplines. Flexibility of the modern narration of the tools, materials and braid pattern utilized, together with the self-restrain on the scope of entitlement shown in the registered context also demonstrate cultural change is permissible under the machinery. An aged but innovative indigenous traditional culture expression with authenticity is sanctioned through the application of The Protection Act. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。