頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 兩得其中:從「裴楷赴弔」重估魏晉莊學人物圖像="Both Sides Are Admissible": A Revaluation of Wei-Jin Zhuangzi Study Examining "Pei Kai's Visit of Condolence" |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 司徒慧賢; | 書刊名 | 中國文學研究 |
| 卷 期 | 57 2024.02[民113.02] |
| 頁 次 | 頁51-97 |
| 分類號 | 121.33 |
| 關鍵詞 | 世說新語; 裴楷; 阮籍; 兩得其中; 時論; 魏晉莊學; Shishuo Xinyu; Pei Kai; Ruan Ji; Both sides are admissible; Both men had found their true center; Shilun; Wei-Jin's Zhuangzi study; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.29419/SICL.202402_(57).0002 |
| 中文摘要 | 今魏晉《莊》學研究隱然有「以著作為主」傾向,多措意注疏、詩、賦、論、贊文體,人物選取上則循玄學史框架,以何晏、王弼、竹林七賢、郭象為焦點。筆者尤期待「探新」,挖掘更多非著作材料並鮮見於玄學史之思想家,補闕魏晉《莊》學全貌。本文選取《世說新語·任誕》第十一則「裴楷赴弔」為示例,先梳理歷代對此則之詮釋歧異,進而分析裴楷對《莊子・大宗師》「孔子」形象之借用,並從史傳鉤沉魏晉河東裴氏家風,以明裴楷玄儒兼治思想。藉深究微觀,筆者從裴楷赴弔「時論」定評發現,魏晉時風於阮籍「任誕」與裴楷「玄儒」兩種《莊》學角力下,時人似傾向認同後者「冥外以護內」展演。此有異於今人以嵇、阮並「任誕」為正始年間思想、風尚代表之觀點。承此,吾人可發現早至正始時期已有「體性抱神,以遊世俗」玄儒解《莊》端緒,此「會通」風勢後為郭象、戴逵牽繫,為魏晉百餘年「時風」之重,當需鉤沉正視。 |
| 英文摘要 | Presently, Wei-Jin Zhuangzi studies mainly focus on literary works. Scholars have researched notes, poems, prose and kept an eye on well-known ideologists such as He Yan, Wang Bi, the Seven Sages of the Bamboo Grove, and Guo Xiang. This paper aims to think outside the box by hunting for untapped, non-literary sources and looking for unexplored thinkers rarely discussed in Wei-Jin's intellectual history. This article starts with the 11th story in the chapter "Free and Unrestrained" in Shishuo Xinyu. First, this paper gathers and analyzes diverse interpretations of this story. Subsequently, it analyzes the body performance expressed by Pei Kai, which is based on the image of Confucius from the chapter "Grand Master" in Zhuangzi. By investigating the family education and family values shared by the Pei clan of Hedong during the Wei-Jin period, it finds that Pei Kai's visit of condolence implies both Confucian and Taoist consciousness. Ruan and Pei's performances stand for two different interpretations of Zhuangzi. In contrast with Ruan Ji's free and unrestrained lifestyle, Pei's ceremonial condolence, "accepting toward outsiders, while preserving his inner principles”冥外以護內,was admired by his contemporaries. It differs from modern discourse that views Ji Kang and Ruan Ji as the ideological representative of the Zhengshi era of Cao Wei (240-249). Thus, the paper finds that the interpretations of Zhuangzi, "keeping the spirit and enjoying himself in the common ways”體性抱神,以遊世俗,which also represents a merging of Confucianism and Taoism, could be found earlier in the Zhengshi era. This merger was later emphasized by Guo Xiang and Dai Kui, becoming a significant concept in the Wei-Jin period's intellectual history. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。