查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 論外國人勞工(移工)團結權之行使與保護--ILO規範基礎、工會組織實務與團結政策
- 七七苗客罷駛事件之探討
- 集體勞動關係法制之研究系列--工會法之部
- 反叛:一項灰頭土臉的行動學習
- 論「兩公約」之勞動基本權規範與實踐:從國際勞動法的觀點反思「兩公約」之批准以及對我國集體勞動關係之影響
- [裁判簡評]工會組織型態與範圍--一些誤解的澄清/北高行99訴1616
- 從經濟全球化談集體勞動三法修正的意涵與影響
- 新勞動三法對臺灣工會的意義及未來的課題
- Governing at a Distance or at Arm's Length: The Divergence of Labor Migration Policy in Taiwan and South Korea
- 從客工到移民之路--借鏡德國移民法之變遷過程,檢視我國移民(工)法制與政策
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 論外國人勞工(移工)團結權之行使與保護--ILO規範基礎、工會組織實務與團結政策=The Exercise and Protection of the Right to Solidarity of Foreign Workers (Migration)--ILO Convention, Trade Union Organization Practices and Policies |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 林良榮; | 書刊名 | 交大法學評論 |
| 卷 期 | 勞動法特刊 2020.12[民109.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁233-270 |
| 分類號 | 556.56 |
| 關鍵詞 | 外國人勞工; 移工; 客工; 集體勞動關係; 工會; 國際勞動法; Foreign labor; Migration; Guest workers; Collective labor relations; Trade unions; International labor law; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 就我國集體勞動關係而言,無論是藍領或白領外勞,就集體勞動權的保 障上,無論是法制面或實務面,相對於本國勞工而言,外國人勞工乃明顯處 於相對不利益之地位,甚至就團結權行使之實踐上,於法令上仍受到相當之 限制。但就實務上,相對於白領外勞(移工)之長期無工會化現象,藍領外 國人勞工(近似客工)長期在相關權利保障之不足或受到忽視(包括勞動契 約以及一般日常生活之不利益地位)而逐漸發展各種「集體性組織」,甚至 於近年就特定職業領域成立相關職業或產業「工會」之組織型態,例如漁業 工作者或看護工作者之工會組織。就我國社會之外國人勞工於勞動關係實務 上之觀察,很明顯的,對於個別勞動關係的保護性規範(勞動條件基準)之 需求或期待乃高於集體勞動關係規範之保障;又,就組織行動面向的觀察, 藍領(客工)之集體行動程度(集體權行使之結果)亦高於白領外勞(移 工)甚多。本研究從 ILO 國際勞動法規範之分析,並介紹臺灣與日本移工行 使團結權之實務發展與爭議,最後並從政策面提出工會政策與移工集體勞動 權保障之方向。 |
| 英文摘要 | As far as Taiwan’s collective labor relations are concerned, whether it is bluecollar or white-collar foreign workers, and in terms of the protection of collective labor rights, whether legal or practical, foreign workers are clearly in a relatively uninterested position relative to domestic workers. Even in the practice of exercising the right to solidarity, there are still considerable restrictions on laws and regulations. However, in practice, compared to the long-term non-unionization of white-collar foreign workers (migrant workers), blue-collar foreign workers (approximately guest workers) have long been inadequate or neglected in the protection of related rights, and gradually develop various “collective organizations”, and even in recent years have established related occupations or industrial “union” or-ganization types in specific occupational fields, such as fishermen or care workers’ unions. Observing the labor relations practices of national laborers outside our society, it is clear that the need or expectation for the protective norms (labor conditions criteria) of individual labor relations is higher than the protection of collective labor relations norms; Observation of action orientation, the degree of collective action (the result of the exercise of collective rights) of blue-collar workers (guest workers) is also much higher than that of white-collar foreign workers (migrant workers). This research is based on the analysis of ILO international labor law norms, and introduces the practical development and controversy of Taiwan and Japan's migrant workers’ exercise of the right to solidarity. Finally, it proposes the direction of union policies and collective labor rights protection of migrant workers from the policy side. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。