查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 兩週游泳衝刺間歇訓練之不同恢復策略對100公尺捷式表現的影響=Effect of Different Recovery Strategies on 100-m Front Crawl Performance during Two Weeks of Sprint Interval Training in Swimming |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 鄭國輝; | 書刊名 | 臺灣體育學術研究 |
| 卷 期 | 77 2024.12[民113.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁22-39 |
| 分類號 | 528.961 |
| 關鍵詞 | 運動表現; 恢復策略; 捷式; 高強度衝刺間歇訓練; 速度訓練; Sports performance; Recovery strategy; Front crawl; High-intensity interval training; Speed training; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.6590/TJSSR.202412_(77).02 |
| 中文摘要 | 游泳衝刺間歇訓練是透過50公尺的全力衝刺,搭配4分鐘的恢復,進行的訓練方式,過去尚未發現有研究針對游泳的衝刺間歇訓練,在衝刺間歇訓練間介入動態恢復是否會影響後續運動表現尚無定論。目的:本研究目的在比較兩週游泳衝刺間歇訓練,介入動態或靜態恢復對訓練後游泳100公尺捷式及訓練表現之影響。方法:以16名大專男性游泳選手為研究對象,介入兩週不同恢復訓練組,分為游泳動態恢復組(active recovery with swimming, ARS)、水中靜態恢復組(passive recovery in water, PRW),訓練前後各進行一次游泳100公尺捷式測驗。以混合設計二因子變異數分析,考驗訓練前後不同恢復處理間之差異,顯著水準設為α = .05。結果:兩週訓練後結果顯示,PRW組在100公尺捷式表現方面顯著進步。而訓練過程中ARS組在第6次訓練中的表現顯著優於第1、4、5次訓練,且訓練期間划幅、划頻以及划手指數呈現交互作用,PRW組的划幅和划手指數顯著優於ARS組。結論:本研究結果指出4分鐘水中靜態恢復可能是提升游泳100公尺捷式表現的較佳方式。 |
| 英文摘要 | Sprint interval training in swimming involves 50 m of all-out sprinting, followed by 4 minutes of recovery. Nevertheless, no study has explored sprint interval training in swimming. Consequently, whether incorporating active recovery during these intervals influences subsequent swimming performance remains unclear. Purpose: This study investigated the effects of 2 weeks of sprint interval training in swimming that involved either active or passive recovery on 100-m swimming performance and overall training performance. Methods: Sixteen male collegiate swimmers participated in this study. The participants underwent different recovery training protocols for 2 weeks: active recovery with swimming (ARS) and passive recovery in water (PRW). A 100-m swim test was conducted before and after the training. A two-way mixed-design analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences between the ARS and PRW groups before and after the training; statistical significance was set at α = .05. Results: After the 2-week training, the 100-m swimming performance of the PRW group improved significantly. During the training process, the ARS group exhibited significantly higher swimming performance in the sixth training session than it did in the first, fourth, and fifth sessions. Additionally, the study observed interaction effects on stroke length, stroke rate, and stroke index during the training period. The PRW group had a significantly more favorable stroke length and stroke index than did the ARS group. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that 4 minutes of PRW is a more effective training protocol for improving 100-m swimming performance. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。