頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 真實性學習環境搭配翻轉教室於訪談技巧之初步成效:解釋型序列設計混合研究=The Preliminary Outcomes of "Flipped Authentic Learning Environment" Method on Interview Skills: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 郭昶志; 蔡宜蓉; 陳明德; 周映君; | 書刊名 | 臺灣職能治療期刊 |
| 卷 期 | 42:2 2024.08[民113.08] |
| 頁 次 | 頁117-140 |
| 分類號 | 521.429 |
| 關鍵詞 | 真實性學習環境; 翻轉教室; 類客觀結構式臨床測驗; 訪談技巧; Authentic learning environment; Flipped classroom; Quasi-objective structured clinical examination; Interview skill; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.6594/TJOT.202408_42(2).0003 |
| 中文摘要 | 目的:(1) 以類客觀結構式臨床測驗 (quasi-objective structured clinical examination, 類 OSCE) 檢驗真實性學習環境搭配翻轉教室與講述式教學搭配模擬教學法,在 教導職能治療學生訪談技巧之成效差異。(2) 探索學生接受上述二項教學模式及 類 OSCE 之主觀學習經驗。 方法:採隨機對照試驗之解釋型序列設計混合研究,納入職能治療大二學生, 實驗組與控制組(各 24 位)分別以真實性學習環境搭配翻轉教室與講述式教學 搭配模擬教學法學習訪談。以獨立樣本 t 檢定檢驗兩組在訪談技巧評量表與標準 病人質性資料蒐集筆試評分表之改變量是否達顯著差異,以內容分析法分析課 程回饋問卷所蒐集之質性資料。 結果:實驗組在合作、發展同理心、主動傾聽、回應、問題組織與總分之訪談 技巧改變量皆顯著高於控制組 (p < .05),然兩組於使用生活話題與筆試評分表之 改變量未達顯著差異。質性回饋顯示真實性學習環境搭配翻轉教室具有更多學 習訪談技巧之優勢,類 OSCE 也有助掌握訪談技巧之應用。 結論:真實性學習環境搭配翻轉教室教學模式與使用類 OSCE 評量學習成效應 有助提升學生訪談技巧與解決其學習困難。 |
| 英文摘要 | Purpose: This study aimed to (1) compare the effect between the flipped authentic learning environment method (FALEM) and the simulated teaching with didactic method (STDM) through quasi-objective structured clinical examination (quasi-OSCE), and to (2) explore the subjective learning experiences of students who received the aforementioned teaching methods and quasi-OSCE. Method: This study used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design and 48 2ndyear occupational therapy students were randomly assigned into the FALEM or STDM groups. Independent t tests were used to compare the scores of interview skills assessment and standard patient’s qualitative data assessment, and content analysis was employed to investigate qualitative data gathered through course reflection questionnaire. Results: The FALEM group had significantly greater change scores in interview skills including collaboration, development of empathy, active listening, reflection, and question organization, compared to the STDM group (p < .05), while the change scores in inclusion of the ordinary and standard patient’s qualitative data assessment did not show significant differences. Qualitative findings indicated that the FALEM offered more advantages for learning interview skills. Additionally, quasi-OSCE enhanced students’ mastery of these skills. Conclusion: The implementation of the FALEM, combined with a quasi-OSCE evaluation, may enhance students’ interview skills and may solve their learning obstacles. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。