查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Antisymmetry, Morphological Merger, and Chinese Resultative Compounding
- Spinal Fusion and Pedicle Screw Instrumentation in the Treatment of Spondylolisthesis Over the Age of 60
- Tuberculosis of the Ankle: Report of Four Cases
- 美國融合教育評鑑成果之探討
- 人類初級視覺中的立體顯像原理簡介
- 融合教育的另一個看法
- 基因融合重組蛋白
- 從融合教育談多元智慧對特殊教育的啟示
- 從文化的發展看臺灣族群的融合
- 外敵威脅下的臺灣內部團結
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | Antisymmetry, Morphological Merger, and Chinese Resultative Compounding=反對稱性、形態合併與漢語動結式複合詞 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 胡旭輝; | 書刊名 | 中國語文研究 |
| 卷 期 | 44:2 2023.12[民112.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁95-122 |
| 分類號 | 802.632 |
| 關鍵詞 | 線性對應理論; 形態合併; 融合; 漢語動結式複合詞; LCA; Morphological merger; Conflation; Chinese resultative compounds; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| DOI | 10.2478/scl-2023-0005 |
| 中文摘要 | 本文以漢語動結式複合詞作為具體的研究案例,探究“反對稱理論”(Kayne 1994, 2022)在構詞研究中的應用。採用分布式形態學中有關句法構詞的理念與技術,尤 其是形態合併(Marantz 1988; Embick and Noyer 2001),本文指出漢語動結式複合 詞的構建涉及狹義句法與音系形式兩個層面:前者帶來融合操作,遵守綫性對應理 論(LCA)帶來的左向嫁接要求;後者涉及到形態合併操作的一種類型,即局部移 位合併;這個合併操作發生在詞項插入時,或在此之前發生,因此不受 LCA 的制約。 本研究表明,探究構詞的內在機制時需要謹慎區分兩種情況,即構詞過程是否受到 LCA 的制約,這取決於語素的組合是在狹義句法階段還是在音系形式階段發生。本 文也指出,融合可以成為跨語言差異的一個維度,這個維度解釋了漢語和英語動結 式中主語和方式動詞之間論旨關係的差異。此外,本文提出了基於漢語功能特徵音 系需求的微觀參數,由此解釋了漢語動結式中的兩個現象:次謂詞必須經歷核心詞 移動,以及要將非賓格動詞致使化,必須添加一個方式動詞(構成動結式複合詞)。 |
| 英文摘要 | This paper takes Chinese resultative compounds as a concrete case to investigate how the theory of antisymmetry (Kayne 1994, 2022) can be applied in the study of word formation. Drawing on the insights and techniques of the syntax of word formation, in particular Morphological Merger from Distributed Morphology (Marantz 1988; Embick and Noyer 2001), we demonstrate that the formation of the Chinese resultative compound involves operations both in narrow syntax and at the level phonological form (PF): the former involves conflation, which has to obey the left-adjunction requirement imposed by Linear Correspondence Axiom (LCA), while the latter is a variety of Morphological Merger, the Local Dislocation Merger, that occurs at or after lexical insertion, thus being immune to LCA restriction. This study emphasizes the importance of being careful about the internal mechanism of word formation, which might either be subjected or immune to LCA restriction depending on whether the combination of the morphemes occurs in narrow syntax or at PF. This paper also argues that conflation can constitute a dimension of parametric variation, which is used to explain the difference between Chinese and English resultatives in terms of the subject-manner verb thematic relationship. Additionally, a micro parameter concerning the phonological requirement of functional features in Chinese is proposed, addressing issues such as the obligatory head movement of the secondary predicate in Chinese and the necessity of a manner verb (to form a resultative compound) to causativize an otherwise unaccusative verb. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。