頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 臺灣地區司法詢問員制度及對大陸“一站式”取證制度之啟示=The Forensic Interviewer System in Taiwan Region and Its Englishtenment to Mainland China's "One-Stop" Evidence Collenction System |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 李延鎖; | 書刊名 | 澳門法學 |
| 卷 期 | 2024:1=55 2024.03[民113.03] |
| 頁 次 | 頁144-156 |
| 分類號 | 589 |
| 關鍵詞 | 臺灣地區; 性侵害; 司法詢問員; 一站式取證; Taiwan region; Sexual assault; Forensic interviewer; One-stop evidence collection; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 2015年底,台灣地區通過所谓的“性侵害犯罪防治法”修法,正式引入司法詢問員制度,在檢 警、法官等主體以外,賦予專業人士詢問性侵被害兒童的權力。“925白玫瑰運動”的推動、社會團體的積極 倡導以及修法之前的經驗累積等多種動因疊織,促成了該制度在立法上的確立。目的層面,司法詢問員制度兼 顧了性侵被害兒童的權利保護以及優質證言的獲取;實踐層面,司法詢問主體采雙軌制,目前仍以檢警詢問為 主,專業人士在詢問過程中的角色呈現多重性。該制度採用了較為固定的詢問架構,保障了詢問的規範性。大 陸地區目前正在探索的“一站式”取證制度可以台灣地區的司法詢問員制度為鏡,在注重保護未成年被害人免 遭二次傷害的同時,應兼顧對優質證言的獲取,同時賦予專業人士詢問未成年被害人的權力,並可通過創制科 學的詢問架構增強詢問的規範性。 |
| 英文摘要 | At the end of 2015, the Taiwan region passed the revision of the "Sexual Assault Crime Prevention Act", officially introducing the forensic interviewer system, giving professionals the power to interview children who have been sexually assaulted, in addition to subjects such as prosecutors, police, and judges. Many intertwined factors, such as the promotion of the "925 White Rose Movement", the active advocacy of social groups, and the judicial practice before the revision of the law, contributed to the establishment of this system in legislation. At the level of purpose, the forensic interviewer system takes into account the protection of the rights of sexually assaulted children and the acqui- sition of high-quality testimony; at the practical level, the subject of forensic interviewing adopts a dual-track system, and at present it is still dominated by prosecutors and police officers. The professionals play multiple roles in the inter- viewing process. The system adopts a fixed inquiry structure to ensure the standardization of inquiries. The "one-stop" evidence collection system currently being explored in mainland China can draw lessons from the forensic interviewer system in Taiwan region. While focusing on protecting child victims from secondary harm, it should take into account the acquisition of high-quality testimony and empower professionals interviewing rights of child victims, and enhance the standardization of the inquiry by creating a scientific inquiry framework. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。