查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 禁訴令、禁執令法律定位研究--以標準必要專利國際平行訴訟案例為考察對象=Research on the Legal Orientation of Anti-suit Injunction and Anti-enforcement Injunction: Taking the International Parallel Litigation Cases of Standard Essential Patents as the Object of Investigation |
---|---|
作 者 | 鍾小凱; | 書刊名 | 一國兩制研究 |
卷 期 | 50 2023.10[民112.10] |
頁 次 | 頁68-75 |
分類號 | 440.61 |
關鍵詞 | 國際平行訴訟; 標準必要專利; 禁訴令; 禁執令; International parallel litigation; Standard essential patents; Anti-suit injunction; Anti-enforcement injunction; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文通過對“華為與康文森”案、“小米與交互數字”案、“三星與愛立信”案、“中興與康 文森”案、“OPPO與夏普”案、“聯想與諾基亞”案等標準必要專利國際平行訴訟中的禁訴令、禁執令案例 的實證考察分析,提出中國應當明確標準必要專利禁訴令、禁執令管轄權依據以及臨時禁令、預防性救濟、跨 越實體法與程序法屬性的法律定位,以期建立健全保障中國法域外適用的標準必要專利禁訴令、禁執令制度體 系。 |
英文摘要 | This paper analyses anti-suit injunctions and anti-enforcement injunctions in international parallel lawsuits against standard-essential patents such as the “Huawei and Convinson,” the “Xiaomi and Interactive Digital,” the “Samsung and Ericsson,” the “ZTE and Convinson,” the “OPPO and Sharp,” and the “Lenovo and Nokia” cases. On the empirical investigation and analysis of the cases, it is proposed that China should clarify the jurisdictional basis of standard-essential patent anti-suit injunction and anti-enforcement injunction, as well as the legal positioning of temporary injunction, preventive relief, and transcending the attributes of substantive law and procedural law. By doing so, China should establish and improve the protection of extra-territorial application of Chinese law, and its standard-essential patent anti-suit injunction and anti-enforcement injunction system. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。