頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 警察人員健康權法制之研究--以超時服勤為中心=A Study on the Legal Systems of Police Officers' Right to Health Focus on Work Overtime |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃慧娟; 林宜鋒; | 書刊名 | 警察行政管理學報 |
卷 期 | 20 2024.05[民113.05] |
頁 次 | 頁1-19 |
分類號 | 575.8 |
關鍵詞 | 警察人員; 健康權; 超時服勤; 基本勤休; 司法院釋字第785號; Police officers; Right to health; Work overtime; Shift regulations; Constitutional interpretation No.785; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 司法院釋字第785號解釋確立「健康權」為憲法第22條保障之基本人權,國 家有保障人民身心健全,不受任意侵害,並負有一定的照顧義務,且立法時應確 保法律內容,符合對人民最低限度的健康權保障。本研究探討健康權演變及相關 研究、警察人員勤休及超時服勤制度,再聚焦於司法院釋字第785號解釋為警察 人員帶來之變革,除以法學研究論證外,輔以量化研究,本研究發現:(1)司 法院釋字第785號解釋促使「警察人員勤休及超時服勤制度」變革;(2)量化研 究結果顯示基層員警普遍認同健康權帶來之變革。並建議「警察勤務條例」與 「警察機關超勤加班費核發要點」應配合修正,且應妥適編排勤務以提高警力使 用效率。 |
英文摘要 | Constitutional interpretation No.785 establishes the “right to health” as a fundamental human right protected under Article 22 of the Constitution. The state is obligated to safeguard the physical and mental well-being of its citizens, ensuring they are not arbitrarily harmed. Furthermore, when legislating, the content of laws should guarantee the minimum level of protection for people’s health. This study delves into the evolution of the right to health, examines the shift and work overtime regulations of police officers, and then focuses on the changes brought about by constitutional interpretation No.785. In addition to legal research, quantitative analysis reveals the following findings. (I)Constitutional interpretation No.785 promotes the reform of “the shift and work overtime regulations of police officers” in Taiwan. (II) Quantitative research results show that grassroots police generally agree with the reform of the new law on the right to health. Recommendations include coordinating amendments to the “Police Duty Act” and the “Police Overtime Pay Directions” as well as appropriately organizing duties to enhance the efficiency of police force utilization. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。