查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 拒絕醫學殖民:臺灣原住民的科學爭議、生物公民權與集體同意法制化
- 易感基因CYP2E1、GSTM1、GSTT1基因多形性在臺灣原住民、泰國及菲律賓等種族間分佈差異之研究
- 原住民與基因研究者對於原住民基因研究的認知差異
- Adiponectin Gene SNP276 Variants and Central Obesity Confer Risks for Hyperglycemia in Indigenous Taiwanese
- 原住民基因研究之倫理課題與規範初探
- The -1131T>C Polymorphism in the Apolipoprotein A5 Gene is Related to Hypertriglyceridemia in Taiwanese Aborigines
- Mitochondrial Myopathy with Predominant Respiratory Dysfunction in a Patient with A3243G Mutation in the Mitochondrial tRNA Gene
- Polymorphisms of Twelve Short Tandem Repeat Loci in a Taiwanese Population and Their Application in Parentage Testing
- 酚類資化酵母菌Candiada tropicalis酚類羥化酶基因的選殖
- Genetic Analysis of the Insulin Receptor Gene in Chinese Patients with Extreme Insulin Resistance
第1筆 /總和 1 筆
/ 1 筆
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 拒絕醫學殖民:臺灣原住民的科學爭議、生物公民權與集體同意法制化=Resisting Biocolonialism: Taiwan Indigenous People's Scientific Controversies, Biological Citizenship, and Legalization of Collective Consent |
---|---|
作者 | 蔡友月; | 書刊名 | 臺灣社會學 |
卷期 | 46 2023.12[民112.12] |
頁次 | 頁47-101 |
分類號 | 588.29 |
關鍵詞 | 基因; 臺灣原住民; 集體同意; 生物公民權; 生物殖民; Genetics; Taiwanese indigenous peoples; Collective consent; Biological citizenship; Biocolonialism; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 2003 年人類基因圖譜定序完成之後,科學研究如何招募研究受 試者以及引發「倫理、法律與社會影響」(Ethical, Legal and Social Implications, ELSI)成為重要議題。到目前為止,原住民族作為全球 基因科技與生物殖民的關注對象,是一個被忽略但值得重視的研究面 向。本文帶入「生物公民權」的概念,藉由分析台灣成為全球第一個 以法制化方式來保障族群集體同意權的案例,來彌補這個重要的研究 空缺。本文指出台灣原住民族面對生物醫學的徵召,在生物公民權的 實踐上有三點重要的意義:一、原住民族採借主流社會的策略,要求 國家對過去科學研究下的生物殖民與剝削進行彌補與修正;二、原住 民族作為台灣少數族群,發展具有族群自主性的生命倫理治理機制, 這是帶有由下而上肯認、賦權與民族自決的意涵;三、這種族群集體 的政治行動與倡議,鑲嵌在全球原住民抵抗生物殖民以及台灣原運與 民主化轉型的脈絡中。最後,本文探討原住民集體同意法制化後,在 實踐上面臨的困境,藉此反省原住民健康治理中深藏的信任/不信 任、原/漢或原住民社群內部權力不平等徵召學的問題。 |
英文摘要 | After the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003, controversies over the “Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications” (ELSI) related to the recruiting of participants have become pivotal concerns. Indigenous peoples as the focus of global bio-colonialism and genetic research have been overlooked and warrant significant attention. Drawing on the concept of “biological citizenship,” this article seeks to fill the gap by analyzing Taiwan as the world’s first case of legally safeguarding the collective consent of indigenous groups, which occurred in 2018. Confronting the biocolonization and medical recruitment, this article illustrates three impacts of this Indigenous biological citizenship in Taiwan. Firstly, Taiwanese indigenous peoples adopt strategies and mobilization to urge the government to rectify all kinds of biocolonialism and exploitation resulting from scientific research in the past. Secondly, as a minority group in Taiwan, indigenous peoples develop bioethics governance based on the law with ethnic autonomy, empowerment from the bottom-up, and self-determination for Taiwanese Indigenous peoples. Thirdly, as a form of collective political action and advocacy, this political movement was embedded in the context of Taiwan’s pro-democracy and Indigenous movements since the 1990s. Finally, examining such recruitmentological issues as the relationship between trust and distrust and power inequality between indigenous and Han peoples, this article shows the difficulty of practicing “collective consent” for indigenous communities in Taiwan. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。