查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Taiwan and the "New Cold War"
- 後冷戰時期中共對臺政治壓力之選擇及其戰略思維之研析
- 從文明衝突到大棋盤--冷戰後美國全球戰略思考的變遷[評Samuel P. Huntington著«The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order»與Zbigniew Brzezinski著«The Grand Chessboard»]
- The Isolationist Heritage and America's Post-Cold War Foreign Policy
- 後冷戰時代國家主權概念的發展
- 後冷戰時代北韓的戰略外交、外交戰略及其對東北亞的影響
- 後冷戰時期臺海兩岸的外交競賽--以與東南亞國家互動關係為例
- 從後冷戰時期強權的亞太戰略談起
- 後冷戰時期美軍角色與任務的改變--組織程序與官僚政治對組織的影響
- 後冷戰時期中共對亞太軍事威脅--南沙領土爭議
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | Taiwan and the "New Cold War"=臺灣與「新冷戰」 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 李語堂; 邵允鍾; | 書刊名 | 歐美研究 |
| 卷 期 | 54:1 2024.03[民113.03] |
| 頁 次 | 頁69-116 |
| 分類號 | 578.2 |
| 關鍵詞 | 美臺中關係; 冷戰; 大國競爭; U.S.-Taiwan-China relations; Cold War; Great power competition; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| DOI | 10.7015/JEAS.202403_54(1).0002 |
| 中文摘要 | 「新冷戰」的概念近年來在關於中美關係現狀和未來的辯論中 備受矚目。在此同時，臺灣海峽的緊張局勢亦引發了美臺關係的廣 泛討論。然而至今為止尚未有文獻將上述兩者整合起來，以評估冷 戰類比是否適用於發生在臺灣海峽的大國競爭。本文分析了冷戰時 期和當前關於臺灣議題的爭論，指出其相同和不同之處。儘管臺灣 的意識形態和政權型態發生了巨大變化，但自 1949 年以來，此一問 題的重要面向仍未改變，包括臺灣對被拋棄的憂慮、美國對自陷爭 議無法脫身的擔憂、美國對臺灣主權問題的中立立場、美國和臺灣 都將臺灣定位為對中華人民共和國意識形態的另類選擇，以及北京 妄稱得到臺灣人民的支持。變易之處則包括臺灣已轉型為自由民主 國家、選民國家認同的變化、對「一中」的支持下降、臺灣對北京 的政治重要性增加、兩岸軍力差距擴大、美中臺的經濟相互依賴， 以及臺灣的地緣經濟重要性。藉由比較這些變與不變之處，本文主 張當前臺灣海峽的衝突風險較冷戰時期來得高。 |
| 英文摘要 | The concept of the “new Cold War” has featured prominently in recent debates about the present and future of U.S.-China relations. Meanwhile, tensions in the Taiwan Strait have sparked considerable debate on the United States’ relationship with Taiwan. There have not, however, been efforts to integrate these two debates to consider whether or not the Cold War analogy applies to great power competition in the Taiwan Strait. This paper analyzes the dispute over Taiwan in the Cold War era and the present day, highlighting both similarities and differences. Despite the vast changes in ideology and regime type in Taiwan, important aspects of this issue have remained consistent since 1949. Continuities include Taiwan’s concern about abandonment; the United States’ concern about entrapment; the United States’ neutral position on Taiwan’s sovereignty; the United States and Taiwan both positioning Taiwan as the ideological alternative to the PRC; and Beijing spuriously claiming that it has the support of Taiwan’s people. Discontinuities also exist, including Taiwan’s transition to a liberal democracy; changing national identity among the electorate; the decline in support for One-China; Taiwan’s higher political importance for Beijing; the distribution of capabilities in the Taiwan Strait; economic interde- pendence between the United States, China, and Taiwan; and Taiwan’s geoeconomic importance. Based on a comparison of these continuities and discontinuities, this article argues that the risk of conflict in the Taiwan Strait is greater now than it was during the Cold War. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。