查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 漢語名詞組省略屬有格標記ê語言結構性因素探討:以臺語衛教演講「咱詞組」為例=The Deletion of Optional Genitive Marker in Chinese: A Case Study on "ê" in "Lán Phrase" in Taiwanese Health Education Talks |
---|---|
作者 | 蔡美慧; | 書刊名 | 台語研究 |
卷期 | 12:1 2020.03[民109.03] |
頁次 | 頁4-37 |
分類號 | 802.632 |
關鍵詞 | 屬有格標記省略; 連合片語; 第一人稱複數包含式代名詞; Deletion of genitive markers; Associate phrases; First person plural inclusive pronoun; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
DOI | 10.6621/JTV.202003_12(1).0001 |
中文摘要 | 較早已經有人注意著漢語名詞片語中「屬有格標記」(就是華語「的」抑是台語「ê」)定定kā簡省,譬如講核心名詞頭前有代名詞修飾抑是限定,抑是兩个名詞之間有密切關係,台語口語語料嘛有這種現象,譬如講佇醫療溝通言談,第一人稱複數代名詞「咱」定定佮各種名詞連合出現成做「咱詞組」,譬如“咱親情朋友”抑是“咱肺部ê血”。本文分析19位醫師ê台語衛生教育演講中676个「咱詞組」,ùi量化角度檢視影響漢語名詞片語中屬有格標記省略ê語言結構性因素。本文主要結果對前人觀點支持佮修正如下:(1)前人認為兩个名詞中間著愛有親密關係才會當省略屬有格標記,毋過本研究發現,咱詞組「含指量詞」抑是「出現佇謂語頭前位置」,這兩種因素比「名詞間關係密切度」佮「詞組長度」兩个因素更加會影響抑是預測屬有格標記ê省略機率。(2)「咱三名詞組」若有保留「ê」會有「鄰核效應」,也就是講愈倚近核心名詞者會愈傾向保留「ê」。咱詞組中NP2 ê語法功能若是「處所副詞」(無論是私密抑是公共領域),傾向出現佇謂語頭前,嘛因此省略「ê」機率相對較懸。 |
英文摘要 | It has been noted that the Chinese genitive marker which connects two noun phrases ("associative phrase" hereafter) is optional in many contexts, for example, when the head NP is modified by a personal pronoun or when a close semantic relationship exists between the two NPs. This pattern is also observed in various spoken Taiwanese genres, such as health communication talks. It is further noted that in such talks, associate phrases led by the first personal plural form "lán" ("lán phrase" hereafter) are frequently used, such as "lán tshin-tsiânn pîng-iú / our relatives and friends" or "lán hì-pōo ê hueh / the blood in our lung". Based on 676 lán phrases observed in Taiwanese health education talks by 19 physicians, this study examined linguistic structure factors related to the deletion of Taiwanese genitive maker "ê" from a quantitative perspective. Our main findings supporting or revising previous contributions include the following. (1) In contrary to previous studies which noted that a genitive marker is optional only when a close semantic tie between the two NPs, we found that "indicative or quantitative expressions" or "the location before predicates" are stronger predictors of ê-deletion in lán phrases than "close relation" and "phrase length" are. (2) Among the two genitive markers in a three-NP phrases, the one closer to the head NP are less likely to be deleted. (3) When the NP2 in a lán phrase functions as a locative phrase, be it a private or public location, the lán phrase tends to occur before the predicates and thus triggers the ê-deletion. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。