頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 臺灣礦業政策合法化之研究:以礦業法修法為例=Research on the Legitimation of Taiwan's Mining Policy: Taking the Mining Act Amendment as an Example |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳介宇; | 書刊名 | 科際整合月刊 |
卷 期 | 9:2 2024.02[民113.02] |
頁 次 | 頁24-43 |
關鍵詞 | 礦業; 礦業法; 礦業政策; 政策合法化; 政策評估; 立法院; Mining industry; Mining Act; Mining policy; Policy legitimation; Policy evaluation; Legislative Yuan; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 2023年5月立法院通過《礦業法》修正案,為20年來臺灣礦業治理的最大改革。本文以Dunn所提出政策過程的評估標準,評估立法院第10屆《礦業法》修法政策合法化之過程,評估結果顯示,本次《礦業法》修法符合效率性、公正性、回應性及適當性等標準,至於效能性及充分性,尚待個案累積與其他政策配套措施之推動情形,方得加以驗證。而政策分析家於政策評估之外,亦須敏察政策系絡中的政治性,始能全面觀照政策推動的樣貌。 |
英文摘要 | In May 2023, the Legislative Yuan, Republic of China passed the amendment to the Mining Act, which was the largest reform of mining governance in Taiwan during the recent 20 years. The author uses the policy process evaluation criteria proposed by William N. Dunn to evaluate the legalization process of the Mining Act Amendment in the 10th session of the Legislative Yuan. The evaluation results show that this revision of the Mining Act is in line with efficiency, fairness, responsiveness and appropriateness. As for the effectiveness and adequacy of other standards, they have yet to be verified by the accumulation of cases and the promotion of other policy supporting measures. In addition to policy evaluation, policy analysts must also be sensitive to the politics of policy relationships in order to be able to fully observe policy promotion. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。