頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 中共「生存型國家利益」的政策變化:胡錦濤與習近平時期之比較=The Policy Change of China's "Survival National Interest": The Comparison between the Xi and Hu Eras |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 張娟瑄; | 書刊名 | 安全與情報研究 |
| 卷 期 | 7:1 2024.01[民113.01] |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-40 |
| 分類號 | 573.07 |
| 關鍵詞 | 國家利益; 核心利益; 習近平國家利益政策; 新威懾常態化; National interest; Core interest; Xi Jinping's national interest policy; The new normal of deterrence; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 內克特蘭 (Donald E. Nuechterlein) 的國家利益理論中,將領 土等利益列入國家首要之「生存利益」,強調該類利益的維護攸 關一國的生存。鑒於該類利益對國家重要性極高,加上筆者觀察 胡錦濤、習近平時期對於觸及「生存型國家利益」事件出現言行 改變,故本文擬以兩時期觸及中國「生存型國家利益」之中印領 土爭端、中日釣魚臺及中菲南海等紛爭,臺灣、香港問題,及維 護中共黨國政體制度存續等個案之政策表現為例,觀察胡、習時 期政策工具選擇偏好。研究發現,胡時期可接受和緩的「妥協」, 習時期更偏好運用強硬「準軍事行動」中的「新威懾常態化」。 例如中印領土衝突上,胡時期可接受簽署相關協議,促進爭議和 平談判,習時期則不僅爆發多次武裝衝突,更強調要提高部隊全 地域全天候連續作戰能力。 |
| 英文摘要 | In his national interest theory, Donald E. Nuechterlein identifies territory as a nation’s survival interest, which is also the most important national interest since territory is a key element of a nation. Due to the importance of survival interest, this article examines the change of survival interest between Hu and Xi era, mainly focuses on China-India territorial dispute, and China’s sovereignty claims over Taiwan, Hong Kong, Xinjian and Tibet. The study found that while Hu was willing to compromise on survival interest, but Xi constantly uses grey zone actions (quasi-military actions) to normalize deterrence to defend China’s survival interest. For example, Hu negotiated and signed agreements to promote the peaceful resolution on China-India territory dispute. But in Xi’s era, China not only used violence against India but also emphasized the need to improve military capability to in deal with various challenges. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。