查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 初探客家族群的社會脈絡、交叉網絡與投票行為:以2020年臺灣總統選舉為例
- 2020年總統選舉客家族群改投給蔡英文嗎?客庄與非客庄的分野
- 「期望地位」對同儕互動的影響分析
- 評丁仁傑著《社會脈絡中的助人行為:臺灣佛教慈濟功德會個案研究》 (臺北市:聯經,1999)
- 在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口--遲滯型高科技風險社會
- Types of Learning Experience of Adult Learners
- 「同儕科學家意像」對科學知識重建過程的影響分析
- 新媒介的科技與社會互動--評Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs eds. by Leah Lievrouw and Sonia Livingstone
- 客家文化重點發展區與原住民行政區競合下之族群關係:以苗票縣泰安鄉為例
- 社會學視角下的母女觀察--以電影《藍色協奏曲》、《喜福會》為例
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 初探客家族群的社會脈絡、交叉網絡與投票行為:以2020年臺灣總統選舉為例=A Preliminary Study on the Social Context, Cross-Networking and Voting Behavior of the Hakka Group: The Case of Taiwan's 2020 Presidential Election |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 湯晏甄; | 書刊名 | 人文及社會科學集刊 |
| 卷 期 | 35:4 2023.12[民112.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁803-849 |
| 分類號 | 572.36 |
| 關鍵詞 | 社會脈絡; 交叉網絡; 客家文化重點發展區; Social context; Cross-cutting networks; Major Hakka cultural areas; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.53106/1018189X202201001 |
| 中文摘要 | 不同的社會脈絡下,政治立場不一致的人際網絡是否影響客家族群的投票行為?乃本文的問題意識。本文援引Mutz(2002a; 2002b)的「交叉網絡」概念,分析2020年總統選舉,不同社會脈絡下,人際網絡「交叉壓力」對客家族群的投票行為的影響。透過TEDS 2020資料分析結果顯示,在社會脈絡與社會網絡的共同作用下,居住在非「客家文化重點發展區」的客家選民較不去投票。此外,選民面臨的交叉壓力愈大,愈會改變投票抉擇,此現象在非「客家文化重點發展區」的客家族群中較為明顯。至於「客家文化重點發展區」的客家族群,則未因交叉壓力愈大而愈會改變投票抉擇。 |
| 英文摘要 | Under different social contexts, do interpersonal network interactions with inconsistent political positions affect the political behavior of the Hakka? This article deals with this issue, employing "cross-cutting networks" as its theoretical structure. Subsequently, it endeavors to amend it based on the social context of the Hakka group, with the aim of applying it to the political situation in Taiwan. Based on analysis of the TEDS 2020, the results show that Hakka voters who live outside of major Hakka cultural areas tended not to vote. In addition, the greater the cross-pressure that voters faced, the more they were to change their voting choice. This phenomenon was more obvious among the Hakka voters who live outside of major Hakka cultural areas. As for the Hakka voters who live in the major Hakka cultural areas, they did not change their voting choice due to increased cross-pressure. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。