頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 論海德格爾存在-神-邏輯學中存在論與神學統一的方式--從「存在者性」出發=On the Way of the Unity of Ontology and Theology in Heidegger's Ontotheology: From the Perspective of "Beingness" |
---|---|
作 者 | 甘從營; | 書刊名 | 道風:基督教文化評論 |
卷 期 | 56 2022.01[民111.01] |
頁 次 | 頁151-172 |
專 輯 | 自然與自在之間:漢語神學沉思 |
分類號 | 147.72 |
關鍵詞 | 存在論; 神學; 存在者性; 最存在者; 存在-神-邏輯學; Ontology; Theology; Beingness; Seiendste; Ontotheology; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 作為西方形而上學基本特徵的存在-神-邏輯學的兩個維度存在論和神學都是在奠基。要想理解這兩種奠基的方式及兩個維度共屬一體的方式需要從存在者性(Seiendheit)出發。存在者性既體現為作為最一般者意義上的存在者性,又體現為作為最高者意義上的存在者性,即最存在者(Seiendste)。存在論上存在呈現為最一般者為存在者奠基,神學上最存在者作為存在的全部豐富性說明着存在。最存在者之所以是存在的全部豐富性,是由於它是最符合存在論維度上的最一般者的。存在論和神學共屬一體的方式在於最存在者是最符合存在論維度的最一般者的。 |
英文摘要 | Ontology and theology, the two dimensions of Ontotheology understood by Heidegger as the essential characteristic of western metaphysics, both aim to lay the ground. In order to understand those two dimensions and their unity, we have to start from the concept of "beingness" (Seiendheit). There are two aspects of beingness. The first aspect is beingness as the most general being; the other is beingness as the highest being, the Seiendste. On the ontological dimension, being presents itself as the most general being and serves as the ground of beings. On the other hand, the Seiendste presents itself as the fullness of being and serves as the ground of beings on the theological dimension. The reason why the Seiendste is the fullness of being is that it is in maximal accordance with the most general being on the ontological dimension. In other words, the highest being on the theological dimension is in maximal accordance with the most general being on the ontological dimension. The unity of ontology and theology is thus achieved. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。