頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 刑法上正當防衛意思之有無對於犯罪構成三要素之影響=Seif-Defense in the Criminal Law and the Three Elements of Crime |
---|---|
作 者 | 翟唳霞; | 書刊名 | 國防管理學院學報 |
卷 期 | 13:2(法學論壇) 民81.07 |
頁 次 | 頁83-91 |
分類號 | 587.136 |
關鍵詞 | 正當防衛; 防衛意思; 客觀主義; 主觀主義; 犯罪成立三要素; Self-defense; Will of defense; Objective theory; Subjective theory; Justification of crime; The three elements; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 正當防衛是合法權利,然而權利不可濫用。不具防衛意思之防衛行為可否認為行使權利之防衛行為,不無疑問,學者對此曾經激烈討論。其關鍵點即在於犯罪成立三要素之結構應屬如何。依照客觀主義之理論,應就外部行為判斷犯罪之成立與否,則容許不具防衛意思之防衛行為成立正當防衛。但主觀主義者認為必須有防衛意思始能成立正當防衛。而防衛意思必要說今已成為德國、日本及我國之通說,甚至許多仍持客觀主義說者亦贊成防衛意思,且不過有時難以自圓其說。惟主觀客觀說者孰優孰劣,仍須靜待發展以證之。 |
英文摘要 | Self-defense is a lawful right. But the lawful right should not be abused. It is therefore doubtful whether the conduct of defense without the will of defense can be thought a lawful defense. About this guestion there were many discussions. The decisive point is the point about the structure of the three elements of Crime. According to the objective theory we must judge, only from an outside act, whether it is a crime or a justxification. This theory allows that the defense without the will of defense is also a lawful defense. But according to the subjective theory it is necessary for the self-defense to have the will of defense. And today in Germany, Japan and in our country it is already the current theory, that the will of defense is necessary. Even if many objectivists also agree to this theory. Only they have not enough reason to support their conclusion. Thus we must wait till we can testify which theory is better. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。