查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 淺談國際間對於國內外農產品之容許量標註
- 國產與進口農產品分流管理--國產牛肉生產追溯制度
- 外銷農產品農藥殘留基準簡介
- 農藥殘留容許量標準與自由貿易
- Pesticide Residue Monitoring in Marketed Fresh Vegetables and Fruits in Central Taiwan (1999-2004) and an Introduction to the HACCP System
- APEC進口食品農藥最大殘留容許量指引簡介
- 由歐盟農藥殘留容許量的調和兼談農藥殘留容許量對貿易的影響
- 國際貿易中的衛生安全標準:產業利益為先或消費者安全為重?
- 韓國實施農藥正面表列制度之簡介
- 油料作物農藥殘留容許量之評估
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 淺談國際間對於國內外農產品之容許量標註=Brief Introduction to the Annotation of Maximum Residue Limits Employed by Different Countries to Regulate Domestic and Imported Agricultural Products |
---|---|
作者 | 杜亞潔; 鄭惠元; 徐慈鴻; | 書刊名 | 臺灣農藥科學 |
卷期 | 7 2019.12[民108.12] |
頁次 | 頁27-37 |
分類號 | 433.85 |
關鍵詞 | 農藥殘留; 容許量; 國產農產品; 進口農產品; Pesticide residue; Maximum residue limits; MRLs; Domestic agricultural product; Imported agricultural product; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 農藥殘留容許量標準是作為農產品進出口貿易的重要規範,確認農民依循農藥規範使用方法之使用量及安全採收期用藥,藉此保障消費者經農產品攝入的農藥殘留量對人體不至於造成健康危害風險。本文簡介國際間容許量標準及農藥使用管理方式,提供主管機關參考,期望能減少農民誤用而違規受罰。歐盟採納共同制定會員國間通用之容許量,使用方法則分屬會員國各自管理,日本、韓國將容許量標註以區分進口或國內登記使用等不同來源,美國對於作物容許量未於國內登記使用者於容許量表列註明,澳洲分列兩份不同文件,一份為適用所有農產品的容許量,另一份適用於訂有澳洲國內農藥使用方法的國產農產品容許量。各國農藥使用方法與容許量標準管理方式各有不同,日韓與我國權責機關架構較為相近,使用方法與容許量訂定分屬不同權責機關,可參採日韓容許量法規,標註登記來源,以利農民遵循相關規範。 |
英文摘要 | Maximum residue limits (MRLs) are established in order to manage the approval of pesticide usage on crops, and also play an important role in international agricultural product trade. This article summarizes the annotation of MRL and how they are applied to pesticide management. The information provided in this report can serve as a reference to authorities for reducing pesticide-use violations in Taiwan. The European Union sets the harmonized MRLs which are applied by all member states whereas each member state manages the application method of pesticide according to the authorized label. In Japan and South Korea, the MRLs give different annotations to demonstrate MRLs setting by import tolerance, domestic registration, and more. The United States only gives annotation for import tolerances. Australia sets two MRLs documents, one for all food commodities including domestic and import commodities, and the other for the management of pesticide registration usage in domestic commodities of Australia. Each country has its feature on the management of pesticide registration and MRL. Owing to the similarity of authority and responsibility units, we suggested the competent authority could refer to the annotation of MRLs in Japan or South Korea and supplement the annotations in Taiwan MRLs regulation. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。