查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Outcome of Type 3 Dental Implant Placement in Sites with and without Flapless Ridge Preservation
- 自然牙和口腔植體longevities的比較
- Comparison in Dental Implant Survival Rate among Patients with Different Smoking Status
- 即拔即種植牙術
- 利用VIP-CT或拔牙窩內反應性軟組織進行齒槽骨嵴保存術
- 人工植牙/牙科植體
- 口腔顎面外科在現代人工植牙所扮演的角色
- 拔牙的器械
- 規律運動對停經前婦女骨密度和性激素的影響
- 基於「骨組織密度」之人工植牙
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Outcome of Type 3 Dental Implant Placement in Sites with and without Flapless Ridge Preservation=利用第3型人工植牙置入法於“無翻瓣齒槽脊保存部位”與“拔牙區自然癒合部位”的結果比較 |
---|---|
作 者 | 沈恆緯; 張儷卿; | 書刊名 | 臺灣口腔顎面外科學會雜誌 |
卷 期 | 31:1 2020.03[民109.03] |
頁 次 | 頁1-11 |
分類號 | 416.96 |
關鍵詞 | 骨密度; 人工植牙; 拔牙; 人工植牙存活率; 齒槽脊保存術; Bone density; Dental implant; Extraction; Implant survival rate; Ridge preservation; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 目的:本研究的目的是利用第3型人工植牙置入法於無翻瓣齒槽脊保存術與拔牙區自然癒合部位的比較。材料和方法:凡是在2011/1〜2017/12期間,於拔牙後的91-150天内放置人工植牙的病例皆包括在此回顧性研究。研究物件分為RP組(應用無翻瓣齒槽脊保存術)和NH組(拔牙區自然癒合)。對許多臨床參數進行了分析,包括:患者的基本人口統計資料(年齡和性別)、植牙位置和植牙手術過程與結果等詳細資訊。結果:本研究共納入75名患者的94支人工植牙。其中有44支上顎植體和50支下顎植體。除了上顎的骨密度分佈外,RP組和NH組在其他參數方面沒有檢測到顯著差異,包括植入物存活率(至少荷重後一年)和總治療時間(從拔牙到義齒完成)。結論:利用第3型人工植牙置入法於“無翻瓣齒槽脊保存術與拔牙區自然癒合”的比較,兩組的植體存活率和總治療時間相當。這項研究發現,在“無翻瓣齒槽脊保存術”部位進行人工植牙,沒有必要等待更長的癒合時間。 |
英文摘要 | Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical parameters between flapless ridge preservation (RP) and natural healing (NH) when performing type 3 dental implant placement. Materials and Methods: The implants which were placed within 91-150 days following extraction between January 2011 and December 2017 were included in this retrospective study. The subjects were divided into two groups: the RP group (extraction wound treated using flapless ridge preservation) and NH group (extraction wound allowed to heal naturally). Baseline demographic data and implant site parameters were analyzed. Results: There were ninety-four implants placed in 75 patients in this retrospective study, including 44 maxillary implants and 50 mandibular implants. Except for bone density distribution in the maxilla, no significant difference was detected between the RP and NH groups with regard to other parameters, including implant survival rate (at least post-loading one year) and total treatment time (from extraction to completion). Conclusions: The survival rate and total treatment time are comparable between the RP and NH groups when performing type 3 dental implant placement. This study indicates that it is not necessary to wait a longer time period for dental implant placement in sites with flapless ridge preservation. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。