查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Influence of a Creative Problem-Solving Approach on College Students' Creativity and Its Relation with Team Cohesion
- 中區五專男子籃球隊團隊凝聚力、球員知覺的教練領導行為和球員滿意度對成績表現之影響
- 探討教練、選手運動目標取向、選手所知覺的運動動機氣候與團隊凝聚力之相關研究
- 解決「鄰避設施」設置管理問題之新議--「創意思考」之實例與應用
- 創意思考的心智枷鎖[談音樂教育]
- 我國救災體系整建及運作功能之研究--以九二一地震為分析對象
- 重建我國救災體系及運作流程之研究
- 從智力理論談技職教育的創意思考教學
- 我國緊急救災體系整建及運作功能之探討--以九二一地震為研究對象
- 教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之相關研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Influence of a Creative Problem-Solving Approach on College Students' Creativity and Its Relation with Team Cohesion=創意問題解決模式對大學生創造力之影響與團隊凝聚力之關聯性 |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳秀玲; 陳宥蓉; | 書刊名 | 教育科學研究期刊 |
卷 期 | 64:3 2019.09[民108.09] |
頁 次 | 頁169-201 |
專 輯 | 創造力、STEAM與自造教育 |
分類號 | 521.422 |
關鍵詞 | 創意問題解決; 創意思考; 工業4.0; 團隊凝聚力; Creative problem-solving; Creative thinking; Industry 4.0; Team cohesion; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討創意問題解決模式對工程學院大學生創造力之影響並探討其創造力與團隊凝聚力之關聯性。研究情境實施在臺灣北部某所公立大學機械工程系課程,研究編製創意問題解決模式,融入「工業4.0理論與實務」專題實作課程,教學課程為期18週,參與者為48名大專生,並將其分為四人小組製作創意專題。本研究採用混合研究設計,蒐集問卷調查(團隊凝聚力問卷)、創造力測量(創意繪圖展開測驗)與半結構式訪談等方式,深入瞭解創意問題解決歷程融入創意思考教學之有效性。本研究採用描述性統計、t檢驗與Pearson相關分析量化之結果。質化分析則採用半結構式訪談來支持量化之結果。研究結果顯示,機械工程系大學生在創意繪圖展開測驗的表現中前後測有顯著性的改善;在學生的創意思考方面,「創新性的創造力」也有顯著性的變化。此外,從質性結果中,發現部分學生對於課堂中教授的創意問題解決步驟和創意思維技巧給予肯定的評價,也有部分學生指出影響其創意產品製作和團隊凝聚力的可能困難和原因。最後,根據量化與質化分析之研究結果,本研究提出研究限制與相關建議,以供教育現場教師及未來相關研究之參考。 |
英文摘要 | This study attempts to present further perspectives upon the effectiveness of developing creative thinking among engineering majors in college both through the incorporation of creative problem-solving (CPS) method and the influence of team cohesion in an engineering course so as to explore the impact of the proposed pedagogical approach on students' creative thinking. The 18-week course plan created in this research features the context of Industry 4.0. A total of 48 participants were enrolled in the course and divided into groups each of which was expected to develop a thematic project. To provide a holistic understanding of the CPS approach's influence on students' creativity, the present research applied a mixed methodology, which included survey questionnaires (team cohesion questionnaire), creativity measurement (creativity test), as well as semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics, t-test and Pearson product-moment correlation were adopted to analyze the quantitative results. Qualitative contents of semi-structured interviews were used to support the quantitative data. The results showed that the engineering college students had a significant improvement between their pre-test score on creativity and their post-test score. Furthermore, a significant change in students' types of creative thinking was also found in terms of their innovative creativity. Besides, interviews with student participants echoed with the quantitative results and showed preferences among students toward certain types of creativity. The qualitative results reveal how some students praised the benefits of the CPS steps as well as those of creative thinking techniques taught in class, how some of them also pointed out the difficulties and reasons that might have influenced their development of a team project, and how the same challenges caused them to struggle with creative thinking and the maintenance of team cohesion. Finally, the research results are summarized and limitations are acknowledged to engage instructors and future studies in a discussion about the implementation of creative training among students and about how it may facilitate their creative thinking. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。