頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 建構農民學院課程訓練成效評核機制=Study on the Follow-up Performance Evaluation of Training Programs of Farmer's Academy |
---|---|
作 者 | 賴信忠; 李宗樺; 戴介三; | 書刊名 | 桃園區農業改良場研究彙報 |
卷期 | 83 2018.06[民107.06] |
頁次 | 頁65-87 |
分類號 | 430.3 |
關鍵詞 | 學習成效; 滿意度; 信心指數; 經營能力; Learning outcomes; Satisfaction; Agriculture sentiment index; Managerial skills; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究以參加2016年農民學院桃園區訓練中心所辦理之初階班、進階班及高階班等5班結訓學員調查對象,研究分為兩部分,第一部分探討農民學院訓練課程成效評估及改善機制,所有結訓學員數190位,回收168份問卷,回收有效問卷88.4%,並同時比較受訪者背景變項對經營農業信心指數,46歲以上7.95顯著高於45歲以下7.36,已從農者7.97顯著高於未從農6.84,而學歷及年資高低則未達顯著差異。受訪者經營能力自評三因素對經營能力信心指數皆呈顯著低度正相關,相關性最高為作物生產與規劃(0.291)。第二部分僅以行銷策略高階訓練班進行課程評核機制分析,顯示學員參訓後對課程重要、學習成效及學習滿意度等對經營能力提升認知皆有顯著差異,藉由重要度及表現分析法可將課程區分為4個象限,配合學習成效、滿意度及課程提升經營能力認知相關性分析,可釐清該訓練班各課程教學成效及改進建議。 |
英文摘要 | This study investigated participants of basic, intermediate and advanced vegetable cultivation training programs held by Taoyuan District Agriculture Training Center (TYDATC) in 2016. This study consists of two parts. The first part is to investigate the effect of Farmers' Academy and how to improve its outcome. 190 participants were investigated, 168 questionnaires were valid (88.4%).Participants background shows significant difference in the agriculture sentiment index (ASI).The ASI of participants who are over 46 years old is 7.95, which is significantly higher than the ASI of participants who are under 45(7.36).ASI of participants who are already in agriculture business is 7.97, which is significantly higher than those who are not in the business. Education background and experience in agriculture business shows no significant difference in ASI. Self-evaluation of participants shows three factors significantly low correlation to ASI. Crop production and planning shows the highest ASI(0.291). The second part is to analyze the outcome of advanced marketing strategy course. The results show that after the course, the importance, learning performance, satisfaction, and management skills are significantly higher. Performance evaluation method was verified by five difference training programs and analyzed by importance performance analysis (IPA), which subsequently can be divided into four quadrants. Different advices for further improving are suggested. With association analysis of learning outcomes, learning satisfaction and management proficiency analysis, one can distinguish the effect from different training programs for future reference. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。